Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters

被引:1
|
作者
Choi, Moon-Hyung [1 ]
Lee, Young-Joon [1 ]
Han, Dongyeob [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Eunpyeong St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 03312, South Korea
[2] Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Seoul 06620, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance fingerprinting; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative analysis; prostate; prostate neoplasm; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; CANCER; DIFFERENTIATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30120750
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This research aimed to assess the relationship between contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) values and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters including (K-trans, K-ep, V-e, and iAUC). To evaluate the correlation between the MRF-derived values (T1 and T2 values, CE T1 and T2 values, T1 and T2 change) and DCE-MRI parameters and the differences in the parameters between prostate cancer and noncancer lesions in 68 patients, two radiologists independently drew regions-of-interest (ROIs) at the focal prostate lesions. Prostate cancer was identified in 75% (51/68) of patients. The CE T2 value was significantly lower in prostate cancer than in noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone and transition zone. K-trans, K-ep, and iAUC were significantly higher in prostate cancer than noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone (p < 0.05), but not in the transition zone. The CE T1 value was significantly correlated with K-trans, V-e, and iAUC in prostate cancer, and the CE T2 value was correlated to V-e in noncancer. Some CE MRF values are different between prostate cancer and noncancer tissues and correlate with DCE-MRI parameters. Prostate cancer and noncancer tissues may have different characteristics regarding contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:10299 / 10310
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in endometrial carcinomas
    Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
    Gruner, Renate
    Husby, Jenny
    Salvesen, Helga B.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (04) : 12 - 12
  • [22] Uncertainty estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Garpebring, Anders
    Brynolfsson, Patrik
    Yu, Jun
    Wirestam, Ronnie
    Johansson, Adam
    Asklund, Thomas
    Karlsson, Mikael
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 69 (04) : 992 - 1002
  • [23] Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Sourbron, Steven P.
    Buckley, David L.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 26 (08) : 1004 - 1027
  • [24] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of ocular melanoma
    Jiang, Xuyuan
    Asbach, Patrick
    Willerding, Gregor
    Dulce, Miriam
    Xu, Ke
    Taupitz, Matthias
    Hamm, Bernd
    Erb-Eigner, Katharina
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung
    Kauczor, HU
    Kreitner, KF
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 34 (03) : 196 - 207
  • [26] Correlation between estimates of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Yankeelov, TE
    Niermann, KJ
    Huamani, J
    Kim, DW
    Quarles, CC
    Fleischer, AC
    Hallahan, DE
    Price, RR
    Gore, JC
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (04) : 487 - 497
  • [27] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Hobbs, Brian Paul
    Wei, Wei
    Kundra, Vikas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (04) : W439 - W448
  • [28] Fast magnetic resonance fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced studies in mice
    Gu, Yuning
    Wang, Charlie Y.
    Anderson, Christian E.
    Liu, Yuchi
    Hu, He
    Johansen, Mette L.
    Ma, Dan
    Jiang, Yun
    Ramos-Estebanez, Ciro
    Brady-Kalnay, Susann
    Griswold, Mark A.
    Flask, Chris A.
    Yu, Xin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06) : 2681 - 2690
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: which modality is appropriate for whom?
    Kamal, Rasha
    Mansour, Sahar
    Farouk, Amr
    Hanafy, Mennatallah
    Elhatw, Ahmed
    Goma, Mohammed Mohammed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):
  • [30] Contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: which modality is appropriate for whom?
    Rasha Kamal
    Sahar Mansour
    Amr Farouk
    Mennatallah Hanafy
    Ahmed Elhatw
    Mohammed Mohammed Goma
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52