Comparative transcriptomics of stem rust resistance in wheat NILs mediated by Sr24 rust resistance gene

被引:2
|
作者
Vishwakarma, Gautam [1 ,2 ]
Saini, Ajay [2 ,3 ]
Bhardwaj, Subhash Chander [4 ]
Kumar, Satish [5 ]
Das, Bikram Kishore [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bhabha Atom Res Ctr, Nucl Agr & Biotechnol Div, Mumbai 400085, Trombay, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Mumbai, India
[3] Bhabha Atom Res Ctr, Mol Biol Div, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] ICAR Res Complex, Indian Inst Wheat & Barley Res, Shimla 171002, India
[5] ICAR Res Complex, Indian Inst Wheat & Barley Res, Karnal, Haryana, India
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
F-SP TRITICI; LEAF RUST; INNATE IMMUNITY; EXPRESSION; GENOME; AGENT; LINES; H2O2;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0295202
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Stem rust of wheat is a deleterious fungal disease across the globe causing severe yield losses. Although, many stem rust resistance genes (Sr) are being used in wheat breeding programs, new emerging stem rust pathotypes are a challenge to important Sr genes. In recent years, multiple studies on leaf and yellow rust molecular mechanism have been done, however, for stem rust such studies are lacking. Current study investigated stem rust induced response in the susceptible wheat genotype C306 and its Near Isogenic Line (NIL) for Sr24 gene, HW2004, using microarray analysis to understand the transcriptomic differences at different stages of infection. Results showed that HW2004 has higher basal levels of several important genes involved in pathogen detection, defence, and display early activation of multiple defence mechanisms. Further Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis identified important genes responsible for pathogen detection, downstream signalling cascades and transcription factors (TFs) involved in activation and mediation of defence responses. Results suggest that generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), cytoskeletal rearrangement, activation of multiple hydrolases, and lipid metabolism mediated biosynthesis of certain secondary metabolites are collectively involved in Sr24-mediated defence in HW2004, in response to stem rust infection. Novel and unannotated, but highly responsive genes were also identified, which may also contribute towards resistance phenotype. Furthermore, certain DEGs also mapped close to the Sr24-linked marker on Thinopyrum elongatum translocated fragment on wheat 3E chromosome, which advocate further investigations for better insights of the Sr24-mediated stem rust resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 associated with nonsuppression of stem rust resistance in the wheat cultivar canthatch
    Kerber, ER
    Aung, T
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (06) : 518 - 521
  • [32] MULTIGENIC INHERITANCE OF STEM RUST RESISTANCE IN WHEAT
    KNOTT, DR
    CROP SCIENCE, 1982, 22 (02) : 393 - 399
  • [33] STUDIES ON GENERAL RESISTANCE TO STEM RUST IN WHEAT
    KNOTT, DR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1977, 19 (03): : 576 - 576
  • [34] Stem Rust Resistance in 'Jagger' Winter Wheat
    Turner, M. Kathryn
    Jin, Yue
    Rouse, Matthew N.
    Anderson, James A.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (04) : 1719 - 1725
  • [35] The inheritance of stem rust resistance in Thatcher wheat
    Knott, DR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (01) : 53 - 63
  • [36] Inheritance of wheat stem rust resistance in triticale
    Adhikari, KN
    McIntosh, RA
    PLANT BREEDING, 1998, 117 (06) : 505 - 513
  • [37] Durable resistance to wheat stem rust needed
    Ayliffe, Michael
    Singh, Ravi
    Lagudah, Evans
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2008, 11 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [38] INHERITANCE OF STEM RUST RESISTANCE IN WEBSTER WHEAT
    KNOTT, DR
    MCINTOSH, RA
    CROP SCIENCE, 1978, 18 (03) : 365 - 369
  • [39] SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PEROXIDASE IN THE RESISTANCE OF THE WHEAT TO STEM RUST
    CHIGRIN, VV
    ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII, 1979, 40 (06): : 860 - 875
  • [40] Genes for stem rust resistance in Thatcher wheat
    Knott, D. R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2009, 89 (06) : 1003 - 1008