Monitoring and evaluation of maritime spatial planning-A review of accumulated practices and guidance for future action

被引:3
|
作者
van den Burg, S. W. K. [1 ]
Skirtun, M. [1 ]
van der Valk, O. [1 ]
Cervi, W. Rossi [1 ]
Selnes, T. [1 ]
Neumann, T. [2 ]
Steinmann, J. [2 ]
Arora, G. [3 ]
Roebeling, P. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Econ Res, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Ramboll Management Consulting, Meeussquare 35, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Monitor Deloitte, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, NL-1081 LA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Aveiro Univ DAO UA, CESAM & Dept Environm & Planning, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Maritime Spatial Planning; Monitoring and Evaluation; Guidance; Equity; Social learning; MANAGEMENT; CONFLICTS; THREATS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105529
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU requires implementation of spatial planning in the marine waters of EU Member States and the establishment of maritime spatial plans by Member States at the latest by 31 March 2021. In Directive 2014/89/EU it is explicitly mentioned that maritime spatial plans shall be reviewed by Member States as decided by them but at least every 10 years. This article aims to review accumulated practices in monitoring and evaluation of maritime spatial plans based on a review of literature, interviews and an expert workshop. Numerous approaches to monitoring and evaluation are applied and available. Monitoring and evaluation of maritime spatial plans is about more than the identification and use of best available methods, it requires sufficient skills and resources, for the evaluators and for stakeholders that might be involved. While not explicitly mentioned in the MSP Directive, equity in the allocation of marine areas for use is highlighted as an important emerging issue. Maritime developments are influenced by a mix of policies and linear approach to M&E fail to capture this complexity. The value of M&E is that is can improve the quality of MSP by instigating and structuring a participative processes with cross-sectoral and cross-border learning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] A systematic review of spatial disaggregation methods for climate action planning
    Patil, Shruthi
    Pflugradt, Noah
    Weinand, Jann M.
    Stolten, Detlef
    Kropp, Juergen
    [J]. ENERGY AND AI, 2024, 17
  • [12] Exploring uses of maritime surveillance data for marine spatial planning: A review of scientific literature
    Dupont, Clement
    Gourmelon, Francoise
    Meur-Ferec, Catherine
    Herpers, Frederick
    Le Visage, Christophe
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2020, 117
  • [13] Evaluation of maritime spatial planning for offshore wind energy in the Canary Islands: A comparative analysis
    Martin-Betancor, M.
    Osorio, J.
    Ruiz-Garcia, A.
    Nuez, I.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2024, 161
  • [14] Mapping and Assessing Cultural Ecosystem Services to Inform Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review
    Banela, Marina
    Kyvelou, Stella Sofia
    Kitsiou, Dimitra
    [J]. HERITAGE, 2024, 7 (02): : 697 - 736
  • [15] Review and evaluation of marine spatial planning in the Shetland Islands
    Kelly, Christina
    Gray, Lorraine
    Shucksmith, Rachel
    Tweddle, Jacqueline F.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2014, 46 : 152 - 160
  • [16] Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit for purpose monitoring strategies
    Stelzenmueller, V.
    Cormier, R.
    Gee, K.
    Shucksmith, R.
    Gubbins, M.
    Yates, K. L.
    Morf, A.
    Aonghusa, C. Nic
    Mikkelsen, E.
    Tweddle, J. F.
    Pecceu, E.
    Kannen, A.
    Clarke, S. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 278
  • [17] Establishing an Integrated Permanent Sea-Level Monitoring Infrastructure towards the Implementation of Maritime Spatial Planning in Cyprus
    Danezis, Chris
    Nikolaidis, Marios
    Mettas, Christodoulos
    Hadjimitsis, Diofantos G.
    Kokosis, Georgios
    Kleanthous, Chrysanthi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (11) : 1 - 19
  • [18] Collaborative spatial multicriteria evaluation: a review and directions for future research
    Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2021, 35 (01) : 9 - 42
  • [19] An Updated Review of Spatial Forest Planning: Approaches, Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Baskent, Emin Zeki
    Borges, Jose Guilherme
    Kaspar, Jan
    [J]. CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2024,
  • [20] Domestic Water Service Delivery Indicators and Frameworks for Monitoring, Evaluation, Policy and Planning: A Review
    Kayser, Georgia L.
    Moriarty, Patrick
    Fonseca, Catarina
    Bartram, Jamie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (10) : 4812 - 4835