Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study

被引:6
|
作者
Luehnen, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Frese, Thomas [3 ]
Mau, Wilfried [4 ]
Meyer, Gabriele [1 ]
Mikolajczyk, Rafael [5 ]
Richter, Matthias J. [6 ]
Schildmann, Jan [7 ]
Braunisch, Matthias [8 ]
Fichtner, Falk [9 ]
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher [8 ,10 ]
Kranke, Peter [11 ]
Popp, Maria [11 ]
Schaaf, Christian [8 ]
Schmaderer, Christoph [8 ]
Seeber, Christian [9 ]
Werner, Anne [12 ]
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo [10 ]
Meerpohl, Joerg [13 ,14 ,15 ]
Steckelberg, Anke [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Hlth & Nursing Sci, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Magdeburger Str 8, D-06112 Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Clin Internal Med 1, Halle, Saale, Germany
[3] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Gen Practice & Family Med, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Halle, Saale, Germany
[4] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Rehabil Med, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Halle, Saale, Germany
[5] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Epidemiol Biometr & Informat, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Halle, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Sociol, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Halle, Saale, Germany
[7] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Hist & Eth Med, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Sci, Halle, Saale, Germany
[8] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[9] Univ Leipzig, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Leipzig, Germany
[10] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Med Educ Ctr, Sch Med, Munich, Germany
[11] Univ Wurzburg, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care Emergency & Pain Me, Wurzburg, Germany
[12] Univ Leipzig, Univ Med Ctr Leipzig, Dept Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Leipzig, Germany
[13] Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Fdn, Freiburg, Germany
[14] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[15] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Inst Evidence Med, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Needs assessment; Consumer health information; Information dissemination; Information seeking behaviour; Pandemic; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundRight from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided.Aim was to explore the general public's information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public's view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data.ResultsSix hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%).ConclusionsThere are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
    Julia Lühnen
    Thomas Frese
    Wilfried Mau
    Gabriele Meyer
    Rafael Mikolajczyk
    Matthias Richter
    Jan Schildmann
    Matthias C. Braunisch
    Falk Fichtner
    Christopher Holzmann-Littig
    Peter Kranke
    Maria Popp
    Christian Schaaf
    Christoph Schmaderer
    Christian Seeber
    Anne Werner
    Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
    Joerg J. Meerpohl
    Anke Steckelberg
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 23
  • [2] Information and Misinformation on COVID-19 a Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Gupta, Latika
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Misra, Durga Prasanna
    Agarwal, Vikas
    Zimba, Otena
    Yessirkepov, Marten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (27)
  • [3] Public Health Information Seeking, Trust, and COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors: Cross-sectional Study
    Tetteh, Emmanuel Kwabena
    Combs, Todd
    Geng, Elvin Hsing
    McKay, Virginia Ruth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (09)
  • [4] Understanding Physicians' Preferences for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
    Nies, Sarah
    Patel, Shae
    Shafer, Melissa
    Longman, Laura
    Sharif, Iman
    Pina, Paulo
    [J]. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (08)
  • [5] Public knowledge and attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination: A cross-sectional study
    Ahmed, Nehad J.
    Alkhawaja, Faisal Z.
    Alrawili, Abdulrahman S.
    Almalki, Ziyad S.
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 25 (108) : 279 - 284
  • [6] Public Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran
    Darrudi, Alireza
    Sari, Ali Akbari
    Yunesian, Masud
    Daroudi, Rajabali
    [J]. HEALTH SCOPE, 2023, 12 (03):
  • [7] The public image of nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
    Yavas, Gamze
    Ozerli, Ayla Nur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2023,
  • [8] Information overload in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional study
    Breyton, Martin
    Schultz, Emilien
    Smith, Allan 'Ben'
    Rouquette, Alexandra
    Mancini, Julien
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 110
  • [9] Concerns About Information Regarding COVID-19 on the Internet: Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhao, Yusui
    Xu, Shuiyang
    Wang, Lei
    Huang, Yu
    Xu, Yue
    Xu, Yan
    Lv, Qiaohong
    Wang, Zhen
    Wu, Qingqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [10] COVID-19 and Unmet Medical Needs for People With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Jung, HyunWoo
    Che, Xianhua
    Park, Hee-Jung
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2022, 59