Port environmental efficiency assessment using the one-stage and two-stage model DEA: comparison of Koper and Dublin ports

被引:5
|
作者
Krmac, Evelin [1 ]
Djordjevic, Boban [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Maritime Studies & Transport, Pot Pomorscakov 4, Portoroz 6320, Slovenia
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Div Transport Planning, Brinellvagen 23, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Environmental efficiency; Evaluation; Benchmarking; Port; One-stage DEA; Two-stage DEA; AIRLINE EFFICIENCY; NETWORK STRUCTURES; BRAZILIAN PORTS; SERVICE QUALITY; CO2; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OUTPUTS; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-023-03151-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ports are important and central hubs for logistical activities in transportation chains that contribute to economic growth. Nevertheless, port activities are associated with undesirable impacts such as energy consumption and air pollutant emissions. Various policy instruments and measures have been developed and adopted to reduce energy consumption and emissions from ports. In an effort to manage all undesirable impacts of port operations, the search for best practices has proven to be an effective approach. This study examines one- and two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models for measuring port environmental efficiency. The adequacy of the models was analyzed using two case studies, i.e., the port of Koper and port of Dublin. The results of the study provided the best practices and the main differences between one-stage and two-stage models. Distance metrics were used to identify the necessary improvements of inefficient decision-making units (DMUs) to achieve the best practices.
引用
收藏
页码:10397 / 10427
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficiency Assessment of Indian Passenger Airlines Using Two-Stage Efficiency Model: Non Traditional DEA Approach
    Seth, Bharti
    Saxena, Punita
    Arora, Shalini
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2021, 41 (05): : 351 - 358
  • [22] EFFICIENCY DECOMPOSITION IN TWO-STAGE DEA MODEL FOR COOPERATIVE EFFICIENCY EVALUATION
    Zha, Yong
    Liang, Liang
    Zhou, Chuiri
    Ren, Lihong
    Xu, Chuanyong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 198 - 206
  • [23] Evaluating Taiwanese Bank Efficiency Using the Two-Stage Range DEA Model
    Kong, Wei-Hsin
    Fu, Tsu-Tan
    Yu, Ming-Miin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2017, 16 (04) : 1043 - 1068
  • [24] A DDF based model for efficiency evaluation in two-stage DEA
    P. F. Wanke
    A. Hadi-Vencheh
    A. Forghani
    Optimization Letters, 2018, 12 : 1029 - 1044
  • [25] TWO-STAGE DEA MODEL FOR COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY IN TERTIARY EDUCATION
    Hanclova, Jana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION, 2016, : 155 - 163
  • [26] A DDF based model for efficiency evaluation in two-stage DEA
    Wanke, P. F.
    Hadi-Vencheh, A.
    Forghani, A.
    OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2018, 12 (05) : 1029 - 1044
  • [27] Extraoral implants for orbit rehabilitation: a comparison between one-stage and two-stage surgeries
    de Mello, M. C. L. M. P.
    Guedes, R., Jr.
    de Oliveira, J. A. P.
    Pecorari, V. A.
    Abrahao, M.
    Dib, L. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (03) : 341 - 347
  • [28] Comparison Study of Dynamic Models for One-stage and Two-stage Anaerobic Digestion Processes
    Pan, Ning
    Wang, Haoping
    Tian, Yang
    Chorukova, Elena
    Simeonov, Ivan
    Christov, Nicolai
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (07): : 667 - 672
  • [29] A comparison between one-stage and two-stage procedures for the creation of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas
    Sheldrake, Ian L.
    Rowlands, Timothy E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 18 : 71 - 74
  • [30] A comparison of one-stage and two-stage Bayesian processes in engineering decision-making
    Maes, M. A.
    Dann, M.
    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 24 (02) : 123 - 137