Patients' Use of a Standardized Medication List - A Mixed Methods Study

被引:3
|
作者
Eickhoff, Christiane [1 ]
Mueller, Uta [1 ]
Thomas, Sophie [2 ]
Schmidt, Christian [2 ]
Hartling, Lisa Sophie [3 ]
Michael, Sebastian [3 ,4 ]
Schulz, Martin [1 ,5 ]
Bertsche, Thilo [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] ABDA Fed Union German Assoc Pharmacists, Dept Med, Heidestr 7, D-10557 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pharm, Med Fac, Clin Pharm Dept, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Lowen Apotheke Waldheim eK, Waldheim, Germany
[4] Saxon Pharmacists Assoc, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Pharm, Berlin, Germany
[6] Univ Leipzig, Med Fac, Drug Safety Ctr, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Leipzig, Germany
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
medication list; medication schedule; medication plan; community pharmacy; medication safety; polypharmacy; KNOWLEDGE; TYPE-2; PLAN; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S427192
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: A medication list (ML) is a document listing the patient's entire medication, instructions for use, and indications. In Germany, a national standard was established in 2016 by law. However, data on patients' use of this standardized ML are scarce. We investigated (i) patients' practical use of the ML, (ii) patients' understanding of the ML, (iii) completeness and correctness of the current ML version, and (iv) reasons why patients did not adhere to their ML.Patients and methods: Community pharmacists recruited patients possessing a standardized ML with >= 5 medications. Information sources to evaluate the ML were: (a) brown bag analysis, (b) practical demonstration, (c) patient interview, and (d) patient file. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods.Results: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (median age: 76 years, range: 27-95) were enrolled. (i) 38.5% of the patients used their ML regularly to prepare their medication and 73.3% to inform their physician. (ii) Overall, patients' understanding of the ML was good, with >80% of the patients being able to identify all relevant information. (iii) While n = 2779 medications were actually taken, n = 2539 were documented on the ML. No ML was fully correct and complete. Regarding particularly relevant items, ie, active ingredient, strength, dosage, medication missing or listed but not taken, 79.2% of ML were incorrect or incomplete. Handwritten modifications on the ML were frequent. (iv) Almost 60% of all patients did not follow their ML with "fear of adverse drug reactions" being the most frequently (n = 50) mentioned reason.Conclusion: Completeness and correctness of the current ML version was poor with handwritten modifications being frequent. Additionally, most of the patients did not adhere to their ML. This indicates that measures that lead to correct and up-to-date ML and improvements in patient counseling about their medication should be developed and implemented into routine practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2655 / 2666
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Medication Adherence Changes in Blacks with Diabetes: A Mixed Methods Study
    Rao, Deepika
    Maurer, Martha
    Meyer, Jodi
    Zhang, Jiaying
    Shiyanbola, Olayinka O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2020, 44 (02): : 257 - 270
  • [22] How Middle Eastern students in the USA use their social networks for medication information: a mixed methods study
    Abdoh, Esra S.
    INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2020, 25 (01):
  • [23] Patients' handling of a standardized medication plan: a pilot study and method development
    Botermann, Lea
    Krueger, Katrin
    Eickhoff, Christiane
    Kloft, Charlotte
    Schulz, Martin
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2016, 10 : 621 - 630
  • [24] The Use of Standardized Patients as an Educational Strategy in Baccalaureate Psychiatric Nursing Simulation: A Mixed Method Pilot Study
    Conway, Kimberly A.
    Scoloveno, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2024, 30 (02) : 414 - 417
  • [25] The Use of Novel Stimulants in ADHD Self-Medication: A Mixed Methods Analysis
    Holborn, Tayler
    Schifano, Fabrizio
    Smith, Emma
    Deluca, Paolo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [26] Beliefs about prescribed medication among older patients with polypharmacy: a mixed methods study in primary care
    Clyne, Barbara
    Cooper, Janine A.
    Boland, Fiona
    Hughes, Carmel M.
    Fahey, Tom
    Smith, Susan M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (660): : E507 - E518
  • [27] Patients' and Clinicians' Preferences on Outcomes and Medication Attributes for Type 2 Diabetes: a Mixed-Methods Study
    Karagiannis, Thomas
    Avgerinos, Ioannis
    Toumpalidou, Maria
    Liakos, Aris
    Kitsios, Konstantinos
    Dimitriadis, Georgios
    Papanas, Nikolaos
    Bargiota, Alexandra
    Avramidis, Iakovos
    Katsoula, Anastasia
    Tentolouris, Anastasios
    Chatziadamidou, Thekla
    Giannakopoulos, Stathis
    Alexiadis, Stavros
    Kotsa, Kalliopi
    Tsapas, Apostolos
    Bekiari, Eleni
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020,
  • [28] Medication Practices and Self-Efficacy of Patients Living With Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Knecht, Janet
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (02) : E107 - E107
  • [29] Patients' Experience With Opioid Pain Medication After Discharge From Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pius, Alexa K.
    Jones, Ethan
    Bonnell, Levi N.
    Fujii, Mayo H.
    MacLean, Charles D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 256 : 328 - 337
  • [30] The Medication Regimen of Patients With Heart Failure: The Gerontologic Considerations and Anticholinergic Burden A Mixed-Methods Study
    Knecht, Janet G.
    Neafsey, Patricia J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2017, 32 (01) : 54 - 66