Patients' Use of a Standardized Medication List - A Mixed Methods Study

被引:3
|
作者
Eickhoff, Christiane [1 ]
Mueller, Uta [1 ]
Thomas, Sophie [2 ]
Schmidt, Christian [2 ]
Hartling, Lisa Sophie [3 ]
Michael, Sebastian [3 ,4 ]
Schulz, Martin [1 ,5 ]
Bertsche, Thilo [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] ABDA Fed Union German Assoc Pharmacists, Dept Med, Heidestr 7, D-10557 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pharm, Med Fac, Clin Pharm Dept, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Lowen Apotheke Waldheim eK, Waldheim, Germany
[4] Saxon Pharmacists Assoc, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Pharm, Berlin, Germany
[6] Univ Leipzig, Med Fac, Drug Safety Ctr, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Leipzig, Germany
来源
关键词
medication list; medication schedule; medication plan; community pharmacy; medication safety; polypharmacy; KNOWLEDGE; TYPE-2; PLAN; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S427192
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: A medication list (ML) is a document listing the patient's entire medication, instructions for use, and indications. In Germany, a national standard was established in 2016 by law. However, data on patients' use of this standardized ML are scarce. We investigated (i) patients' practical use of the ML, (ii) patients' understanding of the ML, (iii) completeness and correctness of the current ML version, and (iv) reasons why patients did not adhere to their ML.Patients and methods: Community pharmacists recruited patients possessing a standardized ML with >= 5 medications. Information sources to evaluate the ML were: (a) brown bag analysis, (b) practical demonstration, (c) patient interview, and (d) patient file. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods.Results: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (median age: 76 years, range: 27-95) were enrolled. (i) 38.5% of the patients used their ML regularly to prepare their medication and 73.3% to inform their physician. (ii) Overall, patients' understanding of the ML was good, with >80% of the patients being able to identify all relevant information. (iii) While n = 2779 medications were actually taken, n = 2539 were documented on the ML. No ML was fully correct and complete. Regarding particularly relevant items, ie, active ingredient, strength, dosage, medication missing or listed but not taken, 79.2% of ML were incorrect or incomplete. Handwritten modifications on the ML were frequent. (iv) Almost 60% of all patients did not follow their ML with "fear of adverse drug reactions" being the most frequently (n = 50) mentioned reason.Conclusion: Completeness and correctness of the current ML version was poor with handwritten modifications being frequent. Additionally, most of the patients did not adhere to their ML. This indicates that measures that lead to correct and up-to-date ML and improvements in patient counseling about their medication should be developed and implemented into routine practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2655 / 2666
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of a standardized medication list for older homecare patients: a pilot study
    Foubert, Katrien
    Mehuys, Els
    Van den Abeele, Dirk
    Haems, Marleen
    Somers, Annemie
    Petrovic, Mirko
    Boussery, Koen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2018, 40 (01) : 230 - 230
  • [2] A Standardized Formulary to Reduce Pediatric Medication Dosing Errors: A Mixed Methods Study
    Bosson, Nichole
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Gausche-Hill, Marianne
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 26 (04) : 492 - 502
  • [3] Developing a standardized list of entomological collection methods for use in databases
    Ferro, Michael L.
    Summerlin, Morgan
    ZOOKEYS, 2019, (861) : 145 - 156
  • [4] Use of standardized patients in patient education practices of senior nursing students: A mixed-methods study
    Orgun, Fatma
    Ozkutuk, Nilay
    Akkoc, Cemre Paylan
    Comglu, Gulsum
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 139
  • [5] Use of Standardized Patients to Enhance Simulation of Medication Administration
    Ham, Kathy L.
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2016, 41 (04) : 166 - 168
  • [6] Family support and medication for opioid use treatment for women: a mixed methods study
    Chou, Jessica L.
    McDowell, Dara
    Bennett, David S.
    Patton, Rikki
    Dilks-Webb, Katherine
    Zaarur, Asif
    Schindler, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS, 2024, 24 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [7] A mixed methods study of student perceptions of using standardized patients for learning and evaluation
    Giesbrecht, Edward M.
    Wener, Pamela F.
    Pereira, Gisele M.
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2014, 5 : 241 - 255
  • [8] Medication adherence among patients with Type 2 diabetes: A mixed methods study
    Aloudah, Nouf M.
    Scott, Neil W.
    Aljadhey, Hisham S.
    Araujo-Soares, Vera
    Alrubeaan, Khalid A.
    Watson, Margaret C.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [9] Patients' perception on generating medication plans in an interprofessional medication management program: a mixed-methods study
    Eickhoff, Christiane
    Mueller, Uta
    Seidling, Hanna Marita
    Lampert, Anette
    Botermann, Lea
    Strunz, Ann Kathrin
    Schulz, Martin
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (05) : 770 - 775
  • [10] Error types with use of medication-related technology: A mixed methods research study
    Shah, Shweta R.
    Galt, Kimberly A.
    Fuji, Kevin T.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (12): : 1480 - 1483