Ranking of G-20 Countries According to Energy Production Sources in the Context of Sustainability by TOPSIS Method

被引:0
|
作者
Menten, Cem [1 ]
Cekic, Bulent [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; Energy Sources; G20; Countries; TOPSIS; Renewable Energy; Sustainability; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DECISION-MAKING; HIERARCHY PROCESS; MULTICRITERIA; SELECTION; RESOURCES; SCENARIOS; LOCATION; POWER; MIX;
D O I
10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.04.19
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The primary purpose of this study is to rank G20 member countries according to different types of energy production at the country level using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques. In this study, G20 countries are ranked according to their energy production using the TOPSIS method, one of the most widely used approaches in the MCDA literature. The alternatives are G20 members, and the criteria consist of electricity generation from fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), renewable energy, nuclear energy, and CO2 emissions. In the 2020-2022 period, G20 countries are evaluated under two scenarios according to different types of energy production. In the first scenario, where all criteria are equally weighted, the United States (USA), European Union (EU), and China ranked highest for each year in the years under evaluation, respectively. In the second scenario, which has an environmental perspective on the weighting of the criteria, similar to the first scenario, the EU and the USA are in the first two places, while France is the third country in the ranking. The most remarkable finding obtained within the scope of the study is that China and Saudi Arabia, which rank highly in the first scenario, are ranked last in the second scenario evaluated from an environmental perspective. Different from the studies in the literature, in this study, evaluations are made with an environmental view by assigning higher weights to the criteria of renewable energy production, nuclear energy production, and emission values.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 408
页数:22
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria Assessment of the Sustainable Share of Renewable Energy Sources in European Countries Using the SSP-TOPSIS Method
    Baczkiewicz, Aleksandra
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    EMERGING CHALLENGES IN INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ECAI 2023-IMIS 2023 WORKSHOP, 2024, 1079 : 255 - 267
  • [22] Analyzing the validity of load capability curve: how economic complexity, renewable energy, R&D, and communication technologies take their part in G-20 countries
    Li, Liyuan
    Chen, Qianxuan
    Mehmood, Usman
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (40) : 92068 - 92083
  • [23] How institutional quality, and energy production sources, affect the environmental sustainability of bri countries: A comparison of different income groups
    Sheng, Weiyan
    Meng, Fei
    Akbar, Muhammad Waqas
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (09):
  • [24] Analyzing the validity of load capability curve: how economic complexity, renewable energy, R&D, and communication technologies take their part in G-20 countries
    Liyuan Li
    Qianxuan Chen
    Usman Mehmood
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 92068 - 92083
  • [25] Evaluating the effectiveness of green finance mechanisms, digitalization, globalization, and renewable energy consumption in advancing environmental sustainability in G20 countries
    Asif, Muhammad
    Yunrong, Long
    Zia, Muhammad Azam
    Hashim, Muhammad
    Bhatti, Uzair Aslam
    Bhatti, Mughair Aslam
    Hasnain, Ahmad
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2025,
  • [26] The key to sustainability: In-depth investigation of environmental quality in G20 countries through the lens of renewable energy, economic complexity and geopolitical risk resilience
    Wang, Anqi
    Rauf, Abdul
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    Wu, Junhao
    Zhao, Xiaolei
    Du, Huimin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 352