What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

被引:17
|
作者
Saleh, Rabab H. [1 ]
Durugbo, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Almahamid, Soud M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arabian Gulf Univ, Dept Innovat & Technol Management, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Abu Dhabi Sch Management, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Ambidexterity; Ambidextrous innovation; Explorative innovation; Exploitative innovation; Innovation strategy; Systematic review; AMBIDEXTROUS INNOVATION; MEDIATING ROLE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; MARKETING CAPABILITIES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SERVICE INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy's support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a gap in knowledge on the determinants that underpin the management of ambidextrous organisations. To tackle this paucity, this article uses a systematic approach to review existing literature on innovation ambidexterity, identifying the main determinants for managing ambidexterity in organisations, and setting an agenda for future management research informed by these determinants. The review assembles and critically appraises 121 articles published between 2007 and 2021. It examines the research clusters, investigated industry sectors, research methodologies, management theories, and research contributions of studies on innovation ambidexterity. The review finds seven main determinants for managing ambidexterity consisting of: (i) process mechanisms, (ii) organisational learning, (iii) leadership styles, (iv) technology investments, (v) organisational contexts, (vi) environmental uncertainties, and (vii) institutional pressures. Using insights from the review process, the article proposes a set of management priorities and suggests seven areas for future ambidexterity research with respect to digital interdependence, organisational legacy, stewardship behaviour, technology sourcing, organisational resilience, environmental readiness, and institutional transformation. Theoretically, the article contributes to knowledge via a multi-level 'wheel' model of ambidexterity management that links management determinants to priorities, and managerially, the review offers a fresh perspective on management factors for ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:3013 / 3056
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): a review-based study
    Nordhoff, Sina
    Kyriakidis, Miltos
    van Arem, Bart
    Happee, Riender
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2019, 20 (06) : 682 - 710
  • [42] Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers' assessment practices: an integrative review of research
    Fulmer, Gavin
    Lee, Iris
    Tan, Kelvin
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (04) : 475 - 494
  • [43] Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
    Ancillai, Chiara
    Sabatini, Andrea
    Gatti, Marco
    Perna, Andrea
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 188
  • [44] Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Scherman, Daniel B.
    Xu, Joshua
    Leung, Vannessa
    Virk, Sohaib
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (01) : 94 - 103
  • [45] Effectiveness of distance-based suicide interventions: multi-level meta-analysis and systematic review
    Schmeckenbecher, Jim
    Rattner, Katrin
    Cramer, Robert J.
    Plener, Paul L.
    Baran, Anna
    Kapusta, Nestor D.
    [J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2022, 8 (04):
  • [46] Influence of approach on Spinopelvic Correction with Lumbar interbody: A Multi-level Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Mao, Jennifer Z.
    O'Connor, Timothy
    Pezzino, Elena
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Khan, Asham
    Nie, Junyu
    Agyei, Justice
    Fritz, Alexander
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 132 (04) : 109 - 109
  • [47] Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kevin Phan
    Daniel B. Scherman
    Joshua Xu
    Vannessa Leung
    Sohaib Virk
    Ralph J. Mobbs
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 94 - 103
  • [48] Embedding the individual within the career ecosystem: A systematic review of multi-level antecedents of multiple job holding
    Bhayana, Chayanika
    Gopakumar, K. V.
    Vohra, Neharika
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 34 (03)
  • [49] MULTI-LEVEL COST-EFFECTIVENESS THRESHOLDS IN EUROPE - RESULTS OF A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTARY RESEARCH
    Kovacs, S.
    Erdosi, D.
    Nemeth, B.
    Zemplenyi, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S648 - S648
  • [50] A conceptual model for open innovation risk management based on the capabilities of SMEs: A multi-level fuzzy MADM approach
    Farjam, Foroogh
    Shojaei, Payam
    Askarifar, Kazem
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2023, 127