What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

被引:17
|
作者
Saleh, Rabab H. [1 ]
Durugbo, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Almahamid, Soud M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arabian Gulf Univ, Dept Innovat & Technol Management, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Abu Dhabi Sch Management, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Ambidexterity; Ambidextrous innovation; Explorative innovation; Exploitative innovation; Innovation strategy; Systematic review; AMBIDEXTROUS INNOVATION; MEDIATING ROLE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; MARKETING CAPABILITIES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SERVICE INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11846-023-00659-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy's support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a gap in knowledge on the determinants that underpin the management of ambidextrous organisations. To tackle this paucity, this article uses a systematic approach to review existing literature on innovation ambidexterity, identifying the main determinants for managing ambidexterity in organisations, and setting an agenda for future management research informed by these determinants. The review assembles and critically appraises 121 articles published between 2007 and 2021. It examines the research clusters, investigated industry sectors, research methodologies, management theories, and research contributions of studies on innovation ambidexterity. The review finds seven main determinants for managing ambidexterity consisting of: (i) process mechanisms, (ii) organisational learning, (iii) leadership styles, (iv) technology investments, (v) organisational contexts, (vi) environmental uncertainties, and (vii) institutional pressures. Using insights from the review process, the article proposes a set of management priorities and suggests seven areas for future ambidexterity research with respect to digital interdependence, organisational legacy, stewardship behaviour, technology sourcing, organisational resilience, environmental readiness, and institutional transformation. Theoretically, the article contributes to knowledge via a multi-level 'wheel' model of ambidexterity management that links management determinants to priorities, and managerially, the review offers a fresh perspective on management factors for ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:3013 / 3056
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges
    Rabab H. Saleh
    Christopher M. Durugbo
    Soud M. Almahamid
    [J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2023, 17 : 3013 - 3056
  • [2] A Multi-Level Model for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Search Phase of the Innovation Process
    Cantarello, Silvia
    Martini, Antonella
    Nosella, Anna
    [J]. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (01) : 28 - 48
  • [3] Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model
    Almalki, Hameeda A.
    Durugbo, Christopher M.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2023, 73 (02) : 731 - 785
  • [4] Managing technology innovation paradoxes through multi-level ambidexterity capabilities
    Ouyang, Taohua
    Cao, Xin
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Sixuan
    [J]. INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 30 (05) : 1503 - 1520
  • [5] A systematic review of multi-level stigma interventions: state of the science and future directions
    Deepa Rao
    Ahmed Elshafei
    Minh Nguyen
    Mark L. Hatzenbuehler
    Sarah Frey
    Vivian F. Go
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 17
  • [6] A systematic review of multi-level stigma interventions: state of the science and future directions
    Rao, Deepa
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Minh Nguyen
    Hatzenbuehler, Mark L.
    Frey, Sarah
    Go, Vivian F.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [7] What makes it so difficult? A systematic review on barriers to radical innovation
    Sandberg, Birgitta
    Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 43 (08) : 1293 - 1305
  • [8] Collaborative networks: a systematic review and multi-level framework
    Durugbo, Christopher
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (12) : 3749 - 3776
  • [9] Digital service innovation challenges faced during servitization: a multi-level perspective
    Burton, Jamie
    Story, Victoria Mary
    Zolkiewski, Judy
    Nisha, Nazifa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35 (02) : 202 - 226
  • [10] Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges
    Smith, Adrian
    Voss, Jan-Peter
    Grin, John
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (04) : 435 - 448