PI- RR: The Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting System for MRI Assessment of Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radiation Therapy or Radical Prostatectomy-A Review

被引:12
|
作者
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Dias, Adriano Basso [1 ,2 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Univ Hlth Network, Mt Sinai Hosp, 610 Univ Ave,Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, 610 Univ Ave,Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
关键词
multiparametric MRI; PI-RR; prostate cancer recurrence; radiation therapy; radical prostatectomy; FOCAL LASER-ABLATION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; INDEX LESION; DIAGNOSIS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.22.28665
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to review clinical application of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system. This system, released in 2021, represents international consensus-based guidelines for the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of multiparametric MRI performed to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy. The system reduces variability through use of a standardized and structured reporting approach whereby the overall level of suspicion of recurrence is classified on a 5-point scale. The overall suspicion score is derived from 5- point scales for assessing DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Separate scales for both DWI and DCE imaging are provided for evaluation after radiation therapy and after radical prostatectomy. These scales account for the relation between detected abnormalities and the location of the primary tumor on pretreatment imaging. T2-weighted imaging is also assessed on a 5-point scale and is useful for anatomic imaging but does not influence the overall score. Initial retrospective studies have shown promising results with respect to the reproducibility and accuracy of PI- RR in detecting locally recurrent tumor.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 861
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Porter, C.
    Walz, J.
    Gallina, A.
    Jeldres, C.
    Kodama, K.
    Gibbons, R.
    Correa Jr., R.
    Perrotte, P.
    Benard, F.
    Saad, F.
    Karakiewicz, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 181 - 181
  • [42] Is ethnicity an independent predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
    Grossfeld, GD
    Latini, DM
    Downs, T
    Lubeck, DP
    Mehta, SS
    Carroll, PR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06): : 2510 - 2515
  • [43] Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Lange, PH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01): : 177 - 178
  • [44] IMPACT OF METABOLIC SYNDROME ON RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Castillejos Molina, R.
    Rodriguez-Covarrubias, F.
    Sotomayor, M.
    Villalobos-Gollas, M.
    Feria Remote, G.
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2009, 6 (03) : 229 - 229
  • [45] Hypertension, obesity and prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    R Asmar
    J L Beebe-Dimmer
    K Korgavkar
    G R Keele
    K A Cooney
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2013, 16 : 62 - 66
  • [46] Visual estimate of prostate cancer predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Manoharan, M
    Civantos, F
    Kim, SS
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 446 - 446
  • [48] THE ROLE OF ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOCAL AND DISTANT RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE-CANCER FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OR RADIATION-THERAPY
    MAYER, FJ
    CRAWFORD, ED
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1994, 21 (04) : 707 - 715
  • [49] Local recurrence of prostate cancer in rectal submucosa after transrectal needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy
    Vaghefi, H
    Magi-Galluzzi, C
    Klein, EA
    UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (04) : 8817 - 8819
  • [50] Salvage therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy
    Busby J.E.
    Cox J.M.
    Current Urology Reports, 2009, 10 (3) : 199 - 205