Assessment of satellite-derived shorelines automatically extracted from Sentinel-2 imagery using SAET

被引:7
|
作者
Pardo-Pascual, J. E. [1 ]
Almonacid-Caballer, J. [1 ]
Cabezas-Rabadan, C. [1 ,2 ]
Fernandez-Sarria, A. [1 ]
Armaroli, C. [3 ]
Ciavola, P. [4 ,5 ]
Montes, J. [4 ,6 ]
Souto-Ceccon, P. E. [4 ]
Palomar-Vazquez, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Geoenvironm Cartog & Remote Sensing Grp CGAT UPV, Dept Cartog Engn Geodesy & Photogrammetry, Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, EPOC,UMR 5805, F-33600 Pessac, France
[3] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Dept Biol Geol & Environm Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Ferrara, Dept Phys & Earth Sci, Ferrara, Italy
[5] Consorzio Futuro Ric, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Univ Cadiz, Dept Earth Sci, Int Campus Excellence Sea CEI MAR, Cadiz, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DIFFERENCE WATER INDEX; SURFACE-WATER; BEACH; DELTA; TOOLS; NDWI;
D O I
10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104426
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The definition of the shoreline position from satellite imagery is of great interest among coastal monitoring techniques. Understanding the reality mapped by the resulting shorelines and defining their accuracy is of paramount importance. The assessment described in this paper constitutes a validation of the shorelines ob-tained by using the novel tool SAET (Shoreline Analysis and Extraction Tool) for automatic shoreline extraction. The resulting shorelines applying the different parameters available in SAET are assessed in 9 test sites with diverse morphology and oceanographic conditions along the Atlantic European and Western Medi-terranean coasts. The reference data is obtained along large coastal segments (covering up to about 240 km) from nearly coincident very high-resolution satellite images. Different image processing levels and extraction methods have been tested, showing their key role in the accuracy of shoreline position. When defining the approximate shoreline position the Automated Water Extraction Index for images without shadows (AWEInsh) with a 0 threshold generally constitutes the best segmentation method. In turn, the employment of the mathematical morphological operations of dilation or erosion considerably improves the results in certain coastal typologies. On the contrary, the employment of atmospherically-corrected images has a smaller influence on the accuracy of the SDSs. Results support the idea that the magnitude of the errors is strongly related to the specific coastal conditions-In general, the lowest errors appear in low-energetic microtidal sites, contrary to the energetic and mesotidal coasts with gentle slopes. The shoreline errors range between 3.7 m and 13.5 m RMSE (root-mean-square error) among the different coastal types when selecting the most appropriate extraction parameters. The shoreline position identified with SAET shows a similar or better accuracy to that obtained by other tools.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the use of Sentinel-2 for coastal habitat mapping and satellite-derived bathymetry estimation using downscaled coastal aerosol band
    Poursanidis, Dimitris
    Traganos, Dimosthenis
    Reinartz, Peter
    Chrysoulakis, Nektarios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 80 : 58 - 70
  • [22] Small Arctic rivers mapped from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and ArcticDEM
    Lu, Xin
    Yang, Kang
    Lu, Yao
    Gleason, Colin J.
    Smith, Laurence C.
    Li, Manchun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 584 (584)
  • [23] Useable Machine Learning for Sentinel-2 multispectral satellite imagery
    Langevin, Scott
    Bethune, Chris
    Horne, Philippe
    Kramer, Steve
    Gleason, Jeffrey
    Johnson, Ben
    Barnett, Ezekiel
    Husain, Fahd
    Bradley, Adam
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XXVII, 2021, 11862
  • [24] Inferring volumetric changes at a shallow lake from subpixel satellite-derived shorelines
    Palomar-Vazquez, Jesus
    Cabezas-Rabadan, Carlos
    Castaneda, Carmen
    Javier Gracia, F.
    Fernandez-Sarria, Alfonso
    Priego-de-los-Santos, Enrique
    Pons-Crespo, Ramon
    Pardo-Pascual, Josep E.
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 149
  • [25] Methods for Satellite Derived Bathymetry from Sentinel-2 images: a comparison
    Figliomeni, F. G.
    Parente, C.
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATION ADVANCES, GEOADVANCES 2024, VOL. 48-4, 2024, : 165 - 173
  • [26] Space-Borne Cloud-Native Satellite-Derived Bathymetry (SDB) Models Using ICESat-2 And Sentinel-2
    Thomas, N.
    Pertiwi, A. P.
    Traganos, D.
    Lagomasino, D.
    Poursanidis, D.
    Moreno, S.
    Fatoyinbo, L.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [27] Estimating Productivity Measures in Guayule Using UAS Imagery and Sentinel-2 Satellite Data
    Combs, Truman P.
    Didan, Kamel
    Dierig, David
    Jarchow, Christopher J.
    Barreto-Munoz, Armando
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [28] INTERPRETABLE SCENICNESS FROM SENTINEL-2 IMAGERY
    Levering, Alex
    Marcos, Diego
    Lobry, Sylvain
    Tuia, Devis
    IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 3983 - 3986
  • [29] Analysis-ready satellite data mosaics from Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery
    Orka, Hans Ole
    Gailis, Janis
    Vege, Mathias
    Gobakken, Terje
    Hauglund, Kenneth
    METHODSX, 2023, 10
  • [30] Evaluating the feasibility of using Sentinel-2 imagery for water clarity assessment in a reservoir
    Bonansea, Matias
    Ledesma, Micaela
    Bazan, Raquel
    Ferral, Anabella
    German, Alba
    O'Mill, Patricia
    Rodriguez, Claudia
    Pinotti, Lucio
    JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 95