Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device

被引:0
|
作者
Seys, Sven F. [1 ]
Gorris, Senne [1 ]
Uyttebroek, Saartje [2 ,3 ]
Backaert, Wout [2 ,4 ]
Jorissen, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Schrijvers, Rik [4 ,5 ]
Daems, Rembert [1 ]
Loeckx, Dirk [1 ]
Van Gerven, Laura [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hellings, Peter W. [2 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Hippo Dx, Res Dept, Aarschot, Belgium
[2] UZ Leuven, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosci, Lab Expt Otorhinolaryngol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Allergy & Clin Immunol Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
[5] UZ Leuven, Dept Gen Internal Med, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ghent, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Ghent, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
skin prick test; allergy diagnosis; standardization; histamine; wheal; ALLERGY; HISTAMINE; IGE;
D O I
10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device.MethodsA total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm.ResultsIn total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations (p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal-distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations (p = 0.73).ConclusionThe prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE SKIN PRICK TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ATOPIC ALLERGY
    DREBORG, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1989, 21 (04) : 820 - 821
  • [42] Computer-aided skin prick test
    Lamminen, Heikki
    Voipio, Ville
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 17 (11) : 975 - 976
  • [43] Role of the Skin Prick Test in Urticaria Patients
    Lote, Samruddhi
    Gupta, Sanjeev B.
    Poulose, Divya
    Deora, Mahendra Singh
    Mahajan, Aditi
    Gogineni, Jaya Madhurya
    Saxena, Sujay
    Chaklader, Biswajit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [44] Skin prick test and patient informed consent
    Pawliczak, Rafal
    ALERGOLOGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF ALLERGOLOGY, 2020, 7 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [45] Skin prick testing
    Cannon, Julie
    Cullinan, Paul
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2019, 69 (04): : 299 - 300
  • [46] DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP OF ALLERGEN, HISTAMINE, AND HISTAMINE RELEASERS IN SKIN PRICK TEST AND PRECISION OF THE SKIN PRICK TEST METHOD
    DREBORG, S
    HOLGERSSON, M
    NILSSON, G
    ZETTERSTROM, O
    ALLERGY, 1987, 42 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [47] Skin prick vs intradermal skin testing in children: Are skin prick tests alone sufficient?
    Wong, DW
    Evans, R
    Pongracic, JA
    Fredrickson, LA
    Nimmagadda, SR
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 105 (01) : S232 - S233
  • [48] Evaluation of commercial skin prick test solutions for selected occupational allergens
    van Kampen, V.
    de Blay, F.
    Folletti, I.
    Kobierski, P.
    Moscato, G.
    Olivieri, M.
    Quirce, S.
    Sastre, J.
    Walusiak-Skorupa, J.
    Kotschy-Lang, N.
    Muesken, H.
    Mahler, V.
    Schliemann, S.
    Ochmann, U.
    Sueltz, J.
    Worm, M.
    Sander, I.
    Zahradnik, E.
    Bruening, T.
    Merget, R.
    Raulf-Heimsoth, M.
    ALLERGY, 2013, 68 (05) : 651 - 658
  • [49] Evaluation of a modified skin prick test for diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy
    Moebs, Christian
    Wiedemann, Desiree
    Pfuetzner, Wolfgang
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (02) : 20 - 27
  • [50] BSACI Nurses in Allergy national skin prick test safety evaluation
    Fitzsimons, R.
    Marriage, D.
    Bartle, J.
    Powrie, K.
    Williams, A.
    Witt, B. D.
    Whisken, J.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2015, 45 (12): : 1893 - 1893