Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device

被引:0
|
作者
Seys, Sven F. [1 ]
Gorris, Senne [1 ]
Uyttebroek, Saartje [2 ,3 ]
Backaert, Wout [2 ,4 ]
Jorissen, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Schrijvers, Rik [4 ,5 ]
Daems, Rembert [1 ]
Loeckx, Dirk [1 ]
Van Gerven, Laura [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hellings, Peter W. [2 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Hippo Dx, Res Dept, Aarschot, Belgium
[2] UZ Leuven, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosci, Lab Expt Otorhinolaryngol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Allergy & Clin Immunol Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
[5] UZ Leuven, Dept Gen Internal Med, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Ghent, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Ghent, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
skin prick test; allergy diagnosis; standardization; histamine; wheal; ALLERGY; HISTAMINE; IGE;
D O I
10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device.MethodsA total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm.ResultsIn total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations (p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal-distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations (p = 0.73).ConclusionThe prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test
    Seys, Sven F.
    Roux, Karolien
    Claes, Caroline
    Van Cappellen, Lore
    Werpin, Louis
    Thompson, Mark
    Loeckx, Dirk
    Sebrechts, Hendrik
    Gorris, Senne
    Van Gerven, Laura
    RHINOLOGY, 2024, 62 (02) : 216 - 222
  • [2] Novel skin prick automated test device contributes to standardization of allergy diagnosis
    Seys, S.
    Gorris, S.
    Uyttebroek, S.
    Backaert, W.
    Jorissen, M.
    Schrijvers, R.
    Daems, R.
    Loeckx, D.
    Van Gerven, L.
    Hellings, P.
    ALLERGY, 2023, 78 : 83 - 84
  • [3] Location, location, location: Interpretability changes in forearm skin prick testing
    De Losa, R.
    Tampaline, L.
    Hannan, L. M.
    Tacey, M.
    Romeo, N.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2022, 27 : 5 - 5
  • [4] More consistent allergy testing with the Skin Prick Automated Test device
    Seys, S.
    Roux, K.
    Claes, C.
    Van Cappellen, L.
    Werpin, L.
    Thompson, M.
    Loeckx, D.
    Sebrechts, H.
    Gorris, S.
    Van Gerven, L.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (08) : 552 - 552
  • [5] Comparison of a new Skin Prick Test Tape with the conventional skin prick test
    Gong, Zhengpeng
    Yang, Zhijie
    Wu, Ran
    Ye, Huiping
    Jia, Min
    Zhang, Nan
    Bachert, Claus
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 143 (01) : 424 - 427
  • [6] THE EVALUATION OF IMMUNOTHERAPY (IT) BY SKIN PRICK TEST METHODS
    DREBORG, S
    BASOMBA, A
    MULLER, C
    LUFKVIST, TL
    HOLGERSSON, M
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1987, 79 (01) : 242 - 242
  • [7] Optimizing the Use of a Skin Prick Test Device on Children
    Buyuktiryaki, Betul
    Sahiner, Umit Murat
    Karabulut, Erdem
    Cavkaytar, Ozlem
    Tuncer, Ayfer
    Sekerel, Bulent Enis
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 162 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [8] REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE SKIN PRICK TEST
    VOHLONEN, I
    TERHO, EO
    KOIVIKKO, A
    VANTO, T
    HOLMEN, A
    HEINONEN, OP
    ALLERGY, 1989, 44 (08) : 525 - 531
  • [9] REPRODUCIBILITY OF SKIN SENSITIVITY USING A QUANTITATIVE SKIN PRICK TEST
    MALLING, HJ
    ALLERGY, 1985, 40 (06) : 400 - 404
  • [10] Skin prick-prick test in diagnosis of allergic diseases
    Budeniene, A
    Dubakiene, R
    ALLERGY, 2002, 57 : 86 - 86