Cost-Benefit Assessment of Offshore Structures Considering Structural Deterioration

被引:3
|
作者
Varela, Gerardo [1 ]
Tolentino, Dante [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana, Dept Mat, 420 San Pablo Ave, Mexico City 02128, Mexico
关键词
optimal time instant; offshore structures; demand exceedance rate; maintenance; cost-benefit analysis; LIFE-CYCLE COST; OPTIMUM DESIGN; INSPECTION; MAINTENANCE; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/jmse11071348
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Offshore facilities are essential infrastructure systems for many nations because their partial or total interruption causes diverse consequences in the economic, political, environmental, and social sectors. With the aim to preserve such structures at acceptable reliability levels, an approach is proposed to calculate the optimal instant of time in which inspection and maintenance works can be performed. The optimal time instant is estimated following the cost benefit criterion (CB) considering the cost of inspection, repair and failure. The inspection cost is given by an inspection quality, while fatigue crack size at different critical joints is calculated to estimate repair costs. In this paper, the concept of demand exceedance rates is introduced to evaluate the failure cost. Uncertainties related to both storm and operational waves are considered. The optimal time instant is associated with the lowest cost of inspection, repair and failure. For this purpose, the approach is exemplified in an offshore jacket structure situated in the Gulf of Mexico. The optimal instant of time corresponds to 6 years after the offshore jacket installation. If maintenance actions are implemented every six years during the lifespan of the system, an economic reduction of 58% is achieved, compared to the case in which no inspection and maintenance works are performed over time. The approach helps decision-makers ensure the best use of economic resources.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-benefit optimization for maintained structures by a renewal model
    Joanni, A.
    Rackwitz, R.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (03) : 489 - 499
  • [22] Cost-benefit analysis for the optimal rehabilitation of deteriorating structures
    Higuchi, S.
    Macke, M.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (04) : 291 - 306
  • [23] Cost-benefit analysis of maintenance interventions for deteriorating structures
    Higuchi, Shoko
    Macke, Michael
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, : 141 - 142
  • [24] Implementation of quantitative risk and cost-benefit analysis in an aging offshore facility
    Lazuardi, Khoir
    Kumaraningrum, Anggraini Ratih
    Hermansyah, Heri
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (S1) : S116 - S127
  • [25] Cost-benefit analysis of the construction of different flexible pavement structures considering the axle load and type of binder
    Bueno, Lucas Dotto
    Specht, Luciano Pivoto
    Pereira, Deividi da Silva
    Ribas, Jeancarlo
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 38 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [26] COST-BENEFIT AND COST CONTAINMENT
    JACOBS, WH
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1982, 28 (02) : 110 - 111
  • [27] AGRIBUSSINESS PROJECTS ASSESSMENT USING COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    Filipovici, Alexandru
    Mnerie, Alin Vasile
    Badescu, Doina
    Bota, Mircea
    Maris, Simina
    Baesu, Viorica
    Slavici, Titus
    Ungureanu, Dragos
    AKTUALNI ZADACI MEHANIZACIJE POLJOPRIVREDE, 2014, 42 : 439 - 445
  • [28] COST-BENEFIT AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICAL GENERATING SYSTEMS
    ALLAN, RN
    SHAALAN, AM
    OCHOA, JR
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1986, 15 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [29] Cost-Benefit Assessment Related to Assurance of Environmental Quality
    Huttmanova, Emilia
    MANAGEMENT 2012: RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS IN THE LIGHT OF PRACTICAL NEEDS, 2012, : 510 - 515
  • [30] Assessment of Damage Risks to Residential Buildings and Cost-Benefit of Mitigation Strategies Considering Hurricane and Earthquake Hazards
    Li, Yue
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2012, 26 (01) : 7 - 16