TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Diagnostically Challenging Melanocytic Neoplasms

被引:2
|
作者
Boutko, Anastasiya [1 ]
Asadbeigi, Sepideh [1 ]
Roth, Andrew [1 ]
Lampley, Nathaniel [1 ]
Olivares, Shantel [1 ]
Dittmann, David [1 ]
Jennings, Lawrence [2 ]
Gerami, Pedram [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Mol Pathol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Dermatol, Dermatol & Pathol, 676 N St Clair St,Suite 1765, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
melanoma; nevi; TERT promoter mutation; deep penetrating nevus; atypical Spitz; MELANOMA; BRAF;
D O I
10.1097/DAD.0000000000002366
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations (TPMs) have been shown to be common in melanoma and uncommon in benign nevi. To assess the use of TPMs as an ancillary diagnostic tool, we report the concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis in clinical cases with distinct differential diagnostic scenarios: dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, atypical Spitz nevus versus melanoma, atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) versus melanoma, and atypical blue nevus versus malignant blue nevus. In a control cohort, we found a positive TPM in 51/70 (73%) of the total melanomas with the highest frequency in vertical growth phase melanoma cases. Conversely, only 2/35 (6%) dysplastic nevi in our control cases were TPM-positive and b were severely atypical dysplastic nevi. Our clinical cohort of 257 cases had a positive TPM in 24% of cases diagnosed as melanoma and in 1% of cases with a benign diagnosis. The overall concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis was 86%. The TPM status had the greatest concordance (95%) with the final diagnosis in the atypical DPN versus melanoma group, with the rest of the groups ranging between 50% and 88%. Overall, our results suggest that TPMs are most useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical DPN versus melanoma. It also has some value in the differential diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumor versus melanoma and dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, whereas in our cohort, it did not contribute meaningfully to differentiating malignant blue nevus and atypical blue nevus.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 299
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [41] How limited molecular testing can also offer diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of thyroid nodules processed with liquid-based cytology: Role of TERT promoter and BRAF V600E mutation analysis
    Dell'Aquila, Marco
    Fiorentino, Vincenzo
    Martini, Maurizio
    Capodimonti, Sara
    Cenci, Tonia
    Lombardi, Celestino Pio
    Raffaelli, Marco
    Pontecorvi, Alfredo
    Fadda, Guido
    Pantanowitz, Liron
    Larocca, Luigi Maria
    Rossi, Esther Diana
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 129 (10) : 819 - 829
  • [42] Glutathione-S-Transferase p1 Gene Promoter Methylation in Cell-Free DNA as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Jinghe
    Wu, Mao
    He, Long
    Chen, Peng
    Liu, Hongtao
    Yang, Hongwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 2023