Medicolegal pitfalls when assessing decision-making capacity in people with cognitive impairment

被引:0
|
作者
Ibrahim, Joseph Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Australian Ctr Evidence Based Aged Care, Aged Care Med Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The global population of older adults will double over the next three decades, and one in 10 will have dementia.Objective: This article examines medicolegal pitfalls when assessing the decision-making capacity of cognitively impaired patients.Discussion: Be aware of the pitfalls while completing the five steps of the assessment. Step 1, the request for a capacity assessment, alerts the clinician that this is more than an administrative form-filling task and that the consultation is not therapeutic. Step 2, initiation of the consultation, requires being prepared for a new diagnosis of dementia, explicitly obtaining consent and understanding the expectations of all involved. Step 3, the clinical assessment, requires avoiding assumptions about the patient and the law, completing tests of cognition, including executive function, and ensuring a detailed understanding of the matter requiring a decision. Step 4, the formulation of opinion and documentation, requires documenting and addressing the legal questions about function and impairment. Step 5, review and reflect assuming somebody will contest the opinion.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 831
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making capacity
    MacLean, DS
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 53 (07) : 588 - 589
  • [32] Assessing the Decision-Making Capacity of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer
    Kolva, Elissa
    Rosenfeld, Barry
    Saracino, Rebecca
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05): : 523 - 531
  • [33] Patterns of impairment in decision-making capacity in Alzheimer's disease and its relationship with cognitive and clinical variables
    Santos, Raquel Luiza
    Simoes Neto, Jose Pedro
    Belfort, Tatiana
    Lacerda, Isabel Barbeito
    Nascimento Dourado, Marcia Cristina
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 44 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [34] Assessing decision-making and capacity in minimally-aware patients
    Coughlan, AK
    Rix, KJB
    Neumann, V
    MEDICINE SCIENCE AND THE LAW, 2005, 45 (03) : 249 - 255
  • [35] Investigating medical decision-making capacity in patients with cognitive impairment using a protocol based on linguistic features
    Tallberg, Ing-Mari
    Stormoen, Sara
    Almkvist, Ove
    Eriksdotter, Maria
    Sundstrom, Erik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 54 (05) : 386 - 392
  • [36] Assessing decision-making capacity in the setting of palliative care research
    Casarett, DJ
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (04) : S6 - S13
  • [37] Periviability Decision-Making: Assessing Provider Characteristics and Cognitive Traits
    Sklar, Ariel
    Yang, Amy
    Martinez, Noelle G.
    Yee, Lynn M.
    WOMENS HEALTH REPORTS, 2021, 2 (01): : 201 - 209
  • [38] Ethical criteria for substitute decision-making in people without capacity
    Barrio Cantalejo, Ines Ma
    Simon Lorda, Pablo
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2006, 80 (04): : 303 - 315
  • [39] Relationships, sexuality and decision-making capacity in people with an intellectual disability
    McGuire, Brian E.
    Bayley, Austin A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 24 (05) : 398 - 402
  • [40] WHEN AND HOW COGNITIVE-STYLE IMPACTS DECISION-MAKING
    KOTTEMANN, JE
    REMUS, WE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIRST, ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, VOLS 1-4: ARCHITECTURE TRACK, SOFTWARE TRACK, DECISION SUPPORT AND KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS TRACK, APPLICATIONS TRACK, 1988, : 223 - 231