Photoresponsive metal-organic polyhedra in metal-organic frameworks: Achieving "real" responsiveness

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Sheng-Tao [1 ]
Tan, Peng [1 ]
Weng, Wen-Qiang [1 ]
Zheng, Long [1 ]
Liu, Xiao-Qin [1 ]
Sun, Lin-Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Chem Engn, Jiangsu Natl Synerget Innovat Ctr Adv Mat SICAM, State Key Lab Mat Oriented Chem Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
metal-organic polyhedra; metal-organic frameworks; adsorption; photoresponsiveness; azobenzene derivatives; CAPTURE; RELEASE; CO2;
D O I
10.1007/s40843-022-2428-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Photoresponsive metal-organic polyhedra (PMOPs) show controllable properties in a broad range of applications, such as adsorption, catalysis, and molecule inclusion. However, the aggregation of bulk PMOPs leads to their inaccessibility of inside nanocages and low regulatory efficiency by light. Herein, a new PMOP (PM2L4) with pendant azobenzene units was synthesized and dispersed into the pores of the metal-organic framework (MOF, PCN-333). The obtained PM2L4@MOF composites show improved CO2 uptake and photoresponsive efficiency. Upon visible-light irradiation, the azobenzene groups stay in the trans state where CO2 molecules can freely enter the nanospace of PM2L4. Nevertheless, upon ultraviolet (UV)-light irradiation, the azobenzene groups transform to the cis state, which hinders the entrance of CO2 to the nanospace of PM2L4. In addition, UV/visible light irradiation can facilitate the reversible cis-/trans-isomerization of the azobenzene groups of PM2L4. The adsorption variation of CO2 captured by PM2L4@MOF composite under light is 15.5%, which is much higher than that of bulk PM2L4 (5.9%). We believe that the findings of this study will provide insights into the potential of PMOPs and may inspire the development of exquisite strategies to efficiently control adsorption processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2726 / 2732
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Liquid metal-organic frameworks
    Gaillac, Romain
    Pullumbi, Pluton
    Beyer, Kevin A.
    Chapman, Karena W.
    Keen, David A.
    Bennett, Thomas D.
    Coudert, Francois-Xavier
    [J]. NATURE MATERIALS, 2017, 16 (11) : 1149 - +
  • [32] Interpenetrating metal-organic frameworks
    Gong, Yun-Nan
    Zhong, Di-Chang
    Lu, Tong-Bu
    [J]. CRYSTENGCOMM, 2016, 18 (15): : 2596 - 2606
  • [33] Hydrophobic Metal-Organic Frameworks
    Joyaramulu, Kolleboyina
    Geyer, Florian
    Schneemann, Andreas
    Kment, Stepan
    Otyepka, Michal
    Zboril, Radek
    Vollmer, Doris
    Fischer, Roland A.
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2019, 31 (32)
  • [34] Metal-Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine
    Horcajada, Patricia
    Gref, Ruxandra
    Baati, Tarek
    Allan, Phoebe K.
    Maurin, Guillaume
    Couvreur, Patrick
    Ferey, Gerard
    Morris, Russell E.
    Serre, Christian
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2012, 112 (02) : 1232 - 1268
  • [35] Distinguishing Metal-Organic Frameworks
    Barthel, Senja
    Alexandrov, Eugeny V.
    Proserpio, Davide M.
    Smit, Berend
    [J]. CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN, 2018, 18 (03) : 1738 - 1747
  • [36] Fulleretic metal-organic frameworks
    Shustova, Natalia
    Williams, Derek
    Dolgopolova, Ekaterina
    Rice, Allison
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [37] MODELING METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS
    Lofgren, J.
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2022, 180 (08): : 10 - 10
  • [38] Photonic Metal-Organic Frameworks
    Cong, Cong
    Ma, Huaibo
    [J]. ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 9 (19)
  • [39] Electrocatalytic metal-organic frameworks
    Noh, Hyunho
    Peters, Aaron
    Farha, Omar
    Hupp, Joseph
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [40] Multivariate metal-organic frameworks
    Aasif Helal
    Zain H.Yamani
    Kyle E.Cordova
    Omar M.Yaghi
    [J]. National Science Review, 2017, 4 (03) : 296 - 298