Multi-objective portfolio selection considering expected and total utility

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Xianhe [1 ]
Ouyang, Yuliang [2 ]
Li, You [3 ]
Liu, Shu [4 ]
Teng, Long [1 ]
Wang, Bo [5 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Adv Mfg, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Clark Univ, Sch Management, Worcester, MA 01608 USA
[3] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[4] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Finance, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ, Sch Management & Engn, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
关键词
Fuzzy portfolio selection; Expected utility; Prospect theory; Disappointment theory; PROSPECT-THEORY; DECISION-MAKING; REFERENCE POINTS; DISAPPOINTMENT; OPTIMIZATION; BELIEFS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104552
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
To address the challenge of risk minimization associated with investors' irrational investment decisions in the face of wealth fluctuations, this article integrates prospect theory and disap-pointment theory into the framework of multi-objective portfolio selection. By concurrently incorporating prospect theory and disappointment theory, this conceptual framework not only considers emotional factors but also offers a comprehensive depiction of individuals' decision-making processes amidst uncertainty. The proposed portfolio selection model aims to balance return and risk by maximizing both expected and total utility. The effectiveness of the proposed model is validated through comparisons with three other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Multi-objective Feature Selection Method Considering the Interaction Between Features
    Namakin, Motahare
    Rouhani, Modjtaba
    Sabzekar, Mostafa
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2024,
  • [42] Portfolio optimisation of material purchase considering supply risk - A multi-objective programming model
    Hao, Jun
    Li, Jianping
    Wu, Dengsheng
    Sun, Xiaolei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 230
  • [43] Interval multi-objective programming methods for solving multi-period portfolio selection problems
    Sun J.
    Xiong Y.
    Zhang H.
    Liu Z.-P.
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (03): : 645 - 650
  • [44] Dynamic portfolio selection in a dual expected utility theory framework
    Cenci, Marisa
    Corradini, Massimiliano
    Gheno, Andrea
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2006, 36 (02): : 505 - 520
  • [45] A comprehensive mathematical model for resource-constrained multi-objective project portfolio selection and scheduling considering sustainability and projects splitting
    RezaHoseini, Ali
    Ghannadpour, Seyed Farid
    Hemmati, Maryam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269
  • [46] Optimization of the Expected Utility Portfolio Selection Model with Box Constraints
    Zhang, Peng
    Yu, Lang
    [J]. ADVANCED RESEARCH ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING, 2011, 153 : 218 - 225
  • [47] Evolutionary methods for multi-objective portfolio optimization
    Radiukyniene, I.
    Zilinskas, A.
    [J]. WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS I-II, 2008, : 1155 - +
  • [48] Portfolio optimisation: A fuzzy multi-objective approach
    Francesc J Ortí
    José B Sáez
    [J]. Journal of Asset Management, 2008, 9 (2) : 138 - 148
  • [49] Portfolio optimisation: A fuzzy multi-objective approach
    Orti, Francesc J.
    Saez, Jose B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2008, 9 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [50] Mean-Variance-Skewness-Entropy Measures: A Multi-Objective Approach for Portfolio Selection
    Usta, Ilhan
    Kantar, Yeliz Mert
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2011, 13 (01) : 117 - 133