Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Self-collection Intervention on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Underscreened US Persons with a Cervix

被引:1
|
作者
Spees, Lisa P. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Biddell, Caitlin B. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Jennifer S. [2 ,3 ]
Des Marais, Andrea C. [3 ]
Hudgens, Michael G. [4 ]
Sanusi, Busola [5 ]
Jackson, Sarah [3 ]
Brewer, Noel T. [2 ,6 ]
Wheeler, Stephanie B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Biostat AIDS Res, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHINESE WOMEN; BREAST; KNOWLEDGE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1267
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection (followed by scheduling assistance for those who were HPV thorn or inconclusive) compared with scheduling assistance only and usual care among underscreened persons with a cervix (PWAC).Methods: A decision tree analysis was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), or the cost per additional PWAC screened, from the Medicaid/state and clinic perspectives. A hypothetical cohort represented 90,807 lowincome, underscreened individuals. Costs and health outcomes were derived from the MyBodyMyTest-3 randomized trial except the usual care health outcomes were derived from literature. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to evaluate model uncertainty. Results: Screening uptake was highest in the self-collection alternative (n = 65,721), followed by the scheduling assistance alternative (n = 34,003) and usual care (n = 18,161). The self collection alternative costs less and was more effective than the scheduling assistance alternative from the Medicaid/state perspective. Comparing the self-collection alternative with usual care, the ICERs were $284 per additional PWAC screened from the Medicaid/state perspective and $298 per additional PWAC screened from the clinic perspective. PSAs demonstrated that the self collection alternative was cost-effective compared with usual care at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $300 per additional PWAC screened in 66% of simulations from the Medicaid/state perspective and 58% of simulations from the clinic perspective.Conclusions: Compared with usual care and scheduling assistance, mailing HPV self-collection kits to underscreened individuals appears to be cost-effective in increasing screening uptake.Impact: This is the first analysis to demonstrate the costeffectiveness of mailed self-collection in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1106
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-collection of vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus screening among women in temporary residential programs
    Harvey, Lara F. B.
    Averbach, Sarah H.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Scott, Jennifer
    Ricciotti, Hope A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) : 546 - 547
  • [22] Yes! To Scaling Up Cervical Cancer Screening With Self-Collection: But the Cost of HPV Screening Must Be Reduced
    Beddoe, Ann Marie
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 : 1327 - 1328
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of a stepwise intervention to promote adherence to cervical cancer screening
    Firmino-Machado, Joao
    Soeteman, Djora, I
    Lunet, Nuno
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 (03): : 401 - 410
  • [24] A cost-effectiveness analysis of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the Australian National Cervical Cancer Screening Program
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Connelly, Luke
    Conway, Elizabeth
    Flocking, Jane S.
    Myers, Evan
    Regan, David G.
    Roder, David
    Ross, Jayne
    Wain, Gerard
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2007, 4 (03) : 165 - 175
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening
    Bidus, Michael A.
    Maxwell, G. Larry
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Rose, G. Scott
    Elkas, John C.
    Chernofsky, Mildred
    Myers, Evan R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (05): : 997 - 1005
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Quebec, Canada
    Vijayaraghavan, Arthi
    Efrusy, Molly B.
    Mayrand, Marie-Helene
    Santas, Christopher C.
    Goggin, Patricia
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2010, 101 (03): : 220 - 225
  • [27] Re: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing Reply
    de Kok, Inge M. C. M.
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1401 - 1402
  • [28] The potential cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the cervical cancer screening programme in South Africa
    Sinanovic, Edina
    Moodley, Jennifer
    Barone, Mark A.
    Mall, Sumaya
    Cleary, Susan
    Harries, Jane
    VACCINE, 2009, 27 (44) : 6196 - 6202
  • [29] Adding a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to the UK cervical cancer screening programme: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kulasingam S.L.
    Benard S.
    Barnabas R.V.
    Largeron N.
    Myers E.R.
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 6 (1)
  • [30] Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1
    Lea, Cary Suzanne
    Perez-Heydrich, Carolina
    Des Marais, Andrea C.
    Richman, Alice R.
    Barclay, Lynn
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Smith, Jennifer S.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (08) : 1094 - 1104