Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Self-collection Intervention on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Underscreened US Persons with a Cervix

被引:1
|
作者
Spees, Lisa P. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Biddell, Caitlin B. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Jennifer S. [2 ,3 ]
Des Marais, Andrea C. [3 ]
Hudgens, Michael G. [4 ]
Sanusi, Busola [5 ]
Jackson, Sarah [3 ]
Brewer, Noel T. [2 ,6 ]
Wheeler, Stephanie B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Biostat AIDS Res, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHINESE WOMEN; BREAST; KNOWLEDGE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1267
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection (followed by scheduling assistance for those who were HPV thorn or inconclusive) compared with scheduling assistance only and usual care among underscreened persons with a cervix (PWAC).Methods: A decision tree analysis was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), or the cost per additional PWAC screened, from the Medicaid/state and clinic perspectives. A hypothetical cohort represented 90,807 lowincome, underscreened individuals. Costs and health outcomes were derived from the MyBodyMyTest-3 randomized trial except the usual care health outcomes were derived from literature. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to evaluate model uncertainty. Results: Screening uptake was highest in the self-collection alternative (n = 65,721), followed by the scheduling assistance alternative (n = 34,003) and usual care (n = 18,161). The self collection alternative costs less and was more effective than the scheduling assistance alternative from the Medicaid/state perspective. Comparing the self-collection alternative with usual care, the ICERs were $284 per additional PWAC screened from the Medicaid/state perspective and $298 per additional PWAC screened from the clinic perspective. PSAs demonstrated that the self collection alternative was cost-effective compared with usual care at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $300 per additional PWAC screened in 66% of simulations from the Medicaid/state perspective and 58% of simulations from the clinic perspective.Conclusions: Compared with usual care and scheduling assistance, mailing HPV self-collection kits to underscreened individuals appears to be cost-effective in increasing screening uptake.Impact: This is the first analysis to demonstrate the costeffectiveness of mailed self-collection in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1106
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus self-collection among cervical cancer screening non-attenders in El Salvador
    Campos, Nicole G.
    Alfaro, Karla
    Maza, Mauricio
    Sy, Stephen
    Melendez, Mario
    Masch, Rachel
    Soler, Montserrat
    Conzuelo-Rodriguez, Gabriel
    Gage, Julia C.
    Alonzo, Todd A.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Felix, Juan C.
    Cremer, Miriam
    Kim, Jane J.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 131
  • [2] The road to cervical cancer elimination in Malaysia: Evaluation of the impact and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening with self-collection and digital registry support
    Keane, Adam
    Ng, Chiu Wan
    Simms, Kate T.
    Nguyen, Diep
    Woo, Yin Ling
    Saville, Marion
    Canfell, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 149 (12) : 1997 - 2009
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Thailand
    Sharma, M.
    Ortendahl, J.
    van der Ham, E.
    Sy, S.
    Kim, J. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (02) : 166 - 176
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway
    Burger, E. A.
    Ortendahl, J. D.
    Sy, S.
    Kristiansen, I. S.
    Kim, J. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (09) : 1571 - 1578
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway
    E A Burger
    J D Ortendahl
    S Sy
    I S Kristiansen
    J J Kim
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 106 : 1571 - 1578
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of a cervical screening program with human papillomavirus vaccine
    Sopina, Elizaveta
    Ashton, Toni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 27 (04) : 290 - 297
  • [7] The role of self-collection devices fog cytology and human papillomavirus DNA testing in cervical cancer screening
    Bidus, MA
    Zahn, CM
    Maxwell, GL
    Rodriguez, M
    Elkas, JC
    Rose, GS
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 48 (01): : 127 - 132
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus cancer screening
    Vijayaraghavan, Arthi
    Efrusy, Molly B.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Santas, Christopher C.
    Huh, Warner K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [9] The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer: A review of recent modelling studies
    Holmes J.
    Hemmett L.
    Garfield S.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 6 (1) : 30 - 37
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing
    van Rosmalen, J.
    de Kok, I. M. C. M.
    van Ballegooijen, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 699 - 709