The Design Communication Assessment Scale (DCAS): Assessing and Adjusting the Effectiveness of Product Design Communications

被引:7
|
作者
Sample, Kevin L. [1 ]
Hulland, John [2 ]
Sevilla, Julio [3 ]
Labrecque, Lauren I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Coll Business, South Kingstown, RI 02881 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Business, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA USA
关键词
product design; scale development; design communications; visual perception; field study; VALIDATION; UNIQUENESS; PERCEPTIONS; RESPONSES; VALIDITY; CHOICE; GREEN; NEED; FORM;
D O I
10.1177/00222437231166342
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research integrates marketing literature, design theory, interviews with world-renowned designers, and established scale development procedures to develop a reliable and valid instrument that measures the effectiveness of design communication (i.e., the information about product designs conveyed through the product, packaging, or advertisements) via consumer evaluations. The theoretical underpinnings and face validity engaged in the development of the Design Communication Assessment Scale (DCAS) progresses the field's understanding as to what constitutes the seven evaluative dimensions of design (form, function, solidity, usefulness, style, eco-consciousness, and uniqueness). Practically, DCAS's versatility provides managers with the ability to gauge consumer evaluations of design communications while enabling better communications with designers. In addition, the authors validate a shortened form of the DCAS for resource-constrained firms. Support for DCAS's generalizability is provided across laboratory and field studies in which ecological validity is established. Together, these studies demonstrate that using DCAS leads to improved performance across a wide array of metrics, including click-through rates, email signups, and retail sales for a diverse set of products.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:27 / 48
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ONLINE COMMUNICATION IN STUDENT PRODUCT DESIGN TEAMS
    Van de Zande, Georgia D.
    Wallace, David R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [22] A system for values, communication, and leadership in product design
    Collopy, PD
    INTERNATIONAL POWERED LIFT CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 95 - 98
  • [23] Test Bed: Communication Through Product Design
    Howie, Roger
    ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2019, 89 (06) : 74 - 79
  • [24] A Joint Communication and Computation Design for Probabilistic Semantic Communications
    Zhao, Zhouxiang
    Yang, Zhaohui
    Chen, Mingzhe
    Zhang, Zhaoyang
    Poor, H. Vincent
    ENTROPY, 2024, 26 (05)
  • [25] A communication adapter design in military tactical mobile communications
    Sun, L
    An, JP
    Wu, YB
    ISTM/2005: 6th International Symposium on Test and Measurement, Vols 1-9, Conference Proceedings, 2005, : 9311 - 9314
  • [26] PRIORITY ARRANGEMENT FOR PRODUCT DESIGN ASSESSMENT
    Yiangkamolsing, Chana
    Erik, Bohez L. J.
    ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2008 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON NEXT GENERATION OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS, 2008, : 1537 - 1538
  • [27] MULTI-SCALE PRODUCT DESIGN AND LIFECYCLE SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS PRODUCT DESIGN
    Sakita, Kazuhiro
    TOOLS AND METHODS OF COMPETITIVE ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 1211 - 1221
  • [28] THE BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS
    KOESTER, J
    OLEBE, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 1988, 12 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [29] Intelligent Product Design for Baby Weighing Scale
    Zhou Leijing
    Chen Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATION, 2015, 16 : 175 - 178
  • [30] Product development: Assessing the consistency of engineering design policies
    Ebert, Ronald J.
    Majerus, Clyde D.
    Rude, Dale E.
    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1992, v (0n) : 140 - 146