Shaping crowdlending investors' trust: Technological, social, and economic exchange perspectives

被引:7
|
作者
Perdana, Arif [1 ]
Jutasompakorn, Pearpilai [2 ]
Chung, Sunghun [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ Indonesia, Data Sci Programme, Tangerang 15345, Indonesia
[2] Singapore Inst Technol, Business Commun & Design Cluster, Singapore 138683, Singapore
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Business, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
Crowdlending; Fintech; Financial technology; Social exchange theory; Trust; Peer-to-peer lending; P2P LENDING PLATFORM; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; MODEL; BORROWERS; FINTECH; INTENTION; ADOPTION; DEFAULT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-023-00650-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rise of crowdlending enables small firms to borrow capital where transaction costs are reduced and financial accessibility is improved. Crowdlending platforms require lenders to depend solely on the information provided by its borrowers. Such information reliance could impact lenders' financial behavior and investment decision and return. In this study, we develop a model to understand what elements and factors influence the formation of trust in crowdlending. Our results suggest that lenders are likely to pay more attention to platform quality and risk mitigation strategy than attractive loan cues. Our findings can aid the crowdlending industry in growing its investor base and increasing potential customers' access to capital. These findings could also assist in developing regulatory guidelines in the crowdlending market.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social Trust, Rule of Law, and Economic Exchange: Evidence from China and Its Major Trading Partners
    Wang, Changyun
    Li, Zonglong
    Zhong, Teng
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2019, 55 (14) : 3134 - 3150
  • [32] Social Impact Investing in Germany: Current Impediments from Investors' and Social Entrepreneurs' Perspectives
    Glaenzel, Gunnar
    Scheuerle, Thomas
    VOLUNTAS, 2016, 27 (04): : 1638 - 1668
  • [33] Current perspectives on social support exchange
    Boerner, K
    Reinhardt, J
    Cantor, M
    Gans, D
    Silverstein, M
    Yang, F
    Litwin, H
    Rhee, N
    Antonucci, T
    Akiyama, H
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2002, 42 : 309 - 309
  • [34] Social Impact Investing in Germany: Current Impediments from Investors’ and Social Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives
    Gunnar Glänzel
    Thomas Scheuerle
    VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2016, 27 : 1638 - 1668
  • [35] ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT - DUTCH
    KLOK, HJ
    ECONOMIST, 1969, 117 (03): : 304 - 306
  • [36] ECONOMIC, SCIENTIFICO-TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL PROGRESS
    STRIEBING, L
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 1979, 27 (10): : 1226 - 1231
  • [37] THE FUTURE OF WORK - TECHNOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHANGES
    BULLINGER, HJ
    LENTES, HP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1982, 20 (03) : 259 - 296
  • [38] Free to trust: Economic freedom and social capital
    Berggren, N
    Jordahl, H
    KYKLOS, 2006, 59 (02) : 141 - 169
  • [39] Social trust: Informal finance and economic transformations
    Firman, Fira Fadhilla
    Akhriani, Ririn
    Mamnunah
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 34 (04)
  • [40] Organizational identification and "currencies of exchange": integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives
    Tavares, Susana M.
    van Knippenberg, Daan
    van Dick, Rolf
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 46 (01) : 34 - 45