A comparative analysis of weight-based machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Ha Giang area

被引:22
|
作者
Thanh Trinh [1 ,2 ]
Binh Thanh Luu [3 ]
Trang Ha Thi Le [4 ]
Duong Huy Nguyen [5 ]
Trong Van Tran [5 ]
Thi Hai Van Nguyen [5 ]
Khanh Quoc Nguyen [5 ]
Lien Thi Nguyen [5 ]
机构
[1] Phenikaa Univ, Fac Comp Sci, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
[2] Phenikaa Res & Technol Inst PRATI, A&A Green Phoenix Grp JSC, 167 Hoang Ngan, Hanoi 11313, Vietnam
[3] Gen Dept Geol & Minerals Vietnam, Northwestern Geol Div, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Thuyloi Univ, Youth Union Off, 175 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Vietnam Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Ctr Remote Sensing & Geohazards, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Landslide; logistic regression; random forest; SVM; Vietnam; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; HYBRID INTEGRATION; DECISION-TREE; GIS; PREDICTION; BIVARIATE; MULTIVARIATE; MOUNTAINS; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1080/20964471.2022.2043520
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) are very crucial for planning policies in hazardous areas. However, the accuracy and reliability of LSMs depend on available data and the selection of suitable methods. This study is conducted to produce LSMs by combinations of machine learning methods and weighting techniques for Ha Giang province, Vietnam, where has limited data. In study area, we gather 11 landslide conditioning factors and establish a landslide inventory map. Computing the weights of classes (or factors) is very important to prepare data for machine learning methods to generate LSMs. We first use frequency ratio (FR) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques to generate the weights. Then, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and AHP methods are combined with FR and AHP weights to yield accurate and reliable LSMs. Finally, the performance of these methods is evaluated by five statistical metrics, ROC and R-index. The empirical results have shown that RF is the best method in terms of R-index and the five metrics, i.e. TP rate (0.9661), FP rate (0.0), ACC (0.9835), MAE (0.0046), and RMSE (0.0350) for this study area. This study opens the perspective of weight-based machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1034
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Machine and Ensemble Learning Based on Remote Sensing Big Data
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Ueda, Naonori
    Saeidi, Vahideh
    Ahmadi, Kourosh
    Halin, Alfian Abdul
    Shabani, Farzin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [42] A novel QLattice-based whitening machine learning model of landslide susceptibility mapping
    Sun, Deliang
    Ding, Yuekai
    Wen, Haijia
    Zhang, Fengtai
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2024, 49 (01) : 304 - 317
  • [43] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Interpretable Machine Learning from the Perspective of Geomorphological Differentiation
    Sun, Deliang
    Chen, Danlu
    Zhang, Jialan
    Mi, Changlin
    Gu, Qingyu
    Wen, Haijia
    LAND, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [44] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using RBFN-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Nguyen, Duc-Dam
    Tiep, Nguyen Viet
    Bui, Quynh-Anh Thi
    Van Le, Hiep
    Prakash, Indra
    Costache, Romulus
    Pandey, Manish
    Pham, Binh Thai
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2025, 142 (01): : 467 - 500
  • [45] Comparison between Deep Learning and Tree-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Saha, Sunil
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    Hembram, Tusar Kanti
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dikshit, Abhirup
    Abdul Maulud, Khairul Nizam
    Alamri, Abdullah M.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [46] Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping
    Azarafza, Mohammad
    Azarafza, Mehdi
    Akgun, Haluk
    Atkinson, Peter M.
    Derakhshani, Reza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [47] Comparative study of sampling strategies for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment
    Liu, Xiao-Dong
    Xiao, Ting
    Zhang, Shao-He
    Sun, Ping-He
    Liu, Lei-Lei
    Peng, Zu-Wu
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 38 (12) : 4935 - 4957
  • [48] Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping
    Mohammad Azarafza
    Mehdi Azarafza
    Haluk Akgün
    Peter M. Atkinson
    Reza Derakhshani
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [49] Stacking ensemble of deep learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China
    Wenjuan Li
    Zhice Fang
    Yi Wang
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022, 36 : 2207 - 2228
  • [50] Landslide susceptibility, ensemble machine learning, and accuracy methods in the southern Sinai Peninsula, Egypt: Assessment and Mapping
    Youssef, Ahmed M.
    El-Haddad, Bosy A.
    Skilodimou, Hariklia D.
    Bathrellos, George D.
    Golkar, Foroogh
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (15) : 14227 - 14258