Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Chen, Xi [1 ]
Li, Hairui [2 ]
Li, Songlin [3 ]
Wang, Yiou [3 ]
Ma, Ruichen [4 ]
Qian, Wenwei [3 ,5 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ,6 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Orthoped Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Orthoped Surg, Beijing 100010, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu 610017, Peoples R China
关键词
hip fracture; neuraxial anaesthesia; general anaesthesia; UNILATERAL SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; GERIATRIC-PATIENTS; SURGICAL REPAIR; MORTALITY; POPULATION; MORBIDITY; DURATION;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. Aim:The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods:This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome. Results:Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group (P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality (P=0.34), delirium (P=0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.40), cardiac infarction (P=0.31), acute heart failure (P=0.34), pulmonary embolism (P=0.24) and pneumonia (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion:A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 468
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Dexmedetomidine in children undergoing general anaesthesia with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Tang, Wen
    He, DongWei
    Liu, YuLin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (06)
  • [32] Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heesen, Michael
    Hofmann, Thomas
    Kloehr, Sven
    Rossaint, Rolf
    van de Velde, Marc
    Deprest, Jan
    Straube, Sebastian
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 (09) : 1092 - 1102
  • [33] Intrathecal clonidine as an adjuvant for neuraxial anaesthesia during caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Crespo, S.
    Dangelser, G.
    Haller, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 32 : 64 - 76
  • [34] Impact of spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on perioperative outcome in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials
    Meng, T.
    Zhong, Z.
    Meng, L.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [35] Tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haj-Younes, Bashar
    Sivakumar, Brahman S.
    Wang, Michael
    An, Vincent V. G.
    Lorentzos, Peter
    Adie, Sam
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (01)
  • [36] Comparative efficacy of Neuraxial and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Xinxun Zheng
    Yuming Tan
    Yuan Gao
    Zhiheng Liu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [37] Comparative efficacy of Neuraxial and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zheng, Xinxun
    Tan, Yuming
    Gao, Yuan
    Liu, Zhiheng
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01) : AR
  • [38] Preventable risk factors of mortality after hip fracture surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Wenli
    Lv, Hongzhi
    Feng, Chen
    Yuwen, Peizhi
    Wei, Ning
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 320 - 328
  • [39] A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kumar, G.
    Stendall, C.
    Mistry, R.
    Gurusamy, K.
    Walker, D.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (10) : 1138 - 1150
  • [40] 'Perioperative outcomes in the context of mode of anaesthesia for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis' (vol 120, pg 37, 2018)
    O'Donnell, C. M.
    McLoughlin, L.
    Patterson, C. C.
    Clarke, M.
    McCourt, K. C.
    McBrien, M. E.
    McAuley, D. F.
    Shields, M. O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (06) : 1442 - 1444