Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Chen, Xi [1 ]
Li, Hairui [2 ]
Li, Songlin [3 ]
Wang, Yiou [3 ]
Ma, Ruichen [4 ]
Qian, Wenwei [3 ,5 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ,6 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Orthoped Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Orthoped Surg, Beijing 100010, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu 610017, Peoples R China
关键词
hip fracture; neuraxial anaesthesia; general anaesthesia; UNILATERAL SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; GERIATRIC-PATIENTS; SURGICAL REPAIR; MORTALITY; POPULATION; MORBIDITY; DURATION;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. Aim:The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods:This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome. Results:Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group (P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality (P=0.34), delirium (P=0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.40), cardiac infarction (P=0.31), acute heart failure (P=0.34), pulmonary embolism (P=0.24) and pneumonia (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion:A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 468
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhushan, Sandeep
    Cheng, Han
    Xiao, Zongwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (11) : 3730 - 3731
  • [2] A commentary on 'Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis'
    He, Xueli
    Shen, Lan
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Yu, Kai
    Shang, Jinye
    Zhou, Zhicong
    Ma, Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (05) : 3091 - 3092
  • [3] Comment on 'Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis'
    Qi, Sumin
    Lin, Guangyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (01) : 596 - 597
  • [4] General vs. neuraxial anaesthesia in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Waesberghe, Julia
    Stevanovic, Ana
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Coburn, Mark
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [5] General vs. neuraxial anaesthesia in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Julia Van Waesberghe
    Ana Stevanovic
    Rolf Rossaint
    Mark Coburn
    BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [6] Haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia versus single-shot spinal anaesthesia or general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Koole, Charlotte
    Bleeser, Tom
    Hoogma, Danny F.
    Coppens, Steve
    Teunkens, An
    Rex, Steffen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 1160 - 1162
  • [7] General versus regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    McClune, W.
    Bernhardt, K.
    Shah, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 : 55 - 55
  • [8] Fragility of the results from trials comparing neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
    Restrepo, Mariana
    Stone, Alexander
    Park, Chang
    Burnett, Garrett
    Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
    Poeran, Jashvant
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (02) : 424 - 427
  • [9] General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery:: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Urwin, SC
    Parker, MJ
    Griffiths, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (04) : 450 - 455
  • [10] Perioperative outcomes in the context of mode of anaesthesia for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Donnell, C. M.
    McLoughlin, L.
    Patterson, C. C.
    Clarke, M.
    McCourt, K. C.
    McBrien, M. E.
    McAuley, D. F.
    Shields, M. O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 37 - 50