Effectiveness and safety of ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus lumboperitoneal shunt for communicating hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Ho, Yi-Jen [1 ]
Chiang, Wen-Chun [2 ]
Huang, Hsin-Yi [3 ]
Lin, Shinn-Zong [1 ,4 ]
Tsai, Sheng-Tzung [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Neurosurg, Hualien, Taiwan
[2] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Chest Med, Hualien, Taiwan
[3] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Med Res, Hualien, Taiwan
[4] Tzu Chi Univ, Sch Med, Hualien, Taiwan
[5] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Neurosurg, 707 Sec 3 Zhongyang Rd, Hualien 970473, Taiwan
关键词
communicating hydrocephalus; lumboperitoneal shunt; meta-analysis; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; NORMAL-PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; ESTIMATORS; PERITONEAL; VARIANCE; EFFICACY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/cns.14086
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe current standard surgical treatment for cerebrospinal fluid diversion is a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) implantation. Lumboperitoneal shunts (LPS) are an alternative treatment for communicating hydrocephalus. Prior studies comparing these two included a limited number of participants. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis determined the treatment failure, complications and effectiveness of lumboperitoneal shunt for communicating hydrocephalus. We reviewed studies with clinical and imaging diagnoses of communicating hydrocephalus, all causes and subtypes of communicating hydrocephalus, and studies that analyzed the primary and secondary outcomes listed below. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and retrospective studies. We performed the meta-analysis in R, using a random-effects model and reporting 95% confidence intervals. ResultsData from 25 studies, including 3654 patients, were analyzed. The total complication rates were 12.98% (188/1448) for lumboperitoneal shunt and 23.80% (398/1672) for ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The odds ratio for lumboperitoneal shunt versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt complication rates was 0.29 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.45, p < 0.0001), and the I-2 was 72%. The shunt obstruction/malfunction rate was 3.99% (48/1204) for lumboperitoneal shunt and 8.31% (115/1384) for ventriculoperitoneal shunt (Odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.79, p = 0.002, I-2 = 0%). Based on the Modified Rankin Scale score, there were no differences in effectiveness between lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Nevertheless, lumboperitoneal shunt improved radiological outcomes. ConclusionsThis analysis demonstrated that lumboperitoneal shunt is a safe and equally effective choice for treating communicating hydrocephalus. More studies are needed to confirm the safety of lumboperitoneal shunt.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 815
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Patients with Obstructive Hydrocephalus: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lu, Liang
    Chen, Hongwu
    Weng, Shaotao
    Xu, Yimin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : 334 - 340
  • [32] Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in human immunodeficiency virus infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    James J. M. Loan
    Michael T. C. Poon
    Steven Tominey
    Ncedile Mankahla
    Graeme Meintjes
    A. Graham Fieggen
    BMC Neurology, 20
  • [33] Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in human immunodeficiency virus infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Loan, James J. M.
    Poon, Michael T. C.
    Tominey, Steven
    Mankahla, Ncedile
    Meintjes, Graeme
    Fieggen, A. Graham
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Laparoscopic-Assisted Peritoneal Access in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelmageed, Sunny
    Sarkar, Prottusha
    Shlobin, Nathan A.
    Davila, Daniel G.
    Potts, Matthew B.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (04) : 734 - 743
  • [35] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antibiotic-Impregnated Shunt Catheters on Anti-Infective Effect of Hydrocephalus Shunt
    Zhou, Wen-xiu
    Hou, Wen-bo
    Zhou, Chao
    Yin, Yu-xia
    Lu, Shou-tao
    Liu, Guang
    Fang, Yi
    Li, Jian-wen
    Wang, Yan
    Liu, Ai-hua
    Zhang, Hai-jun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 64 (02) : 297 - 308
  • [36] Prognostic Utility of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Treated with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Park, H. Y.
    Park, C. R.
    Suh, C. H.
    Kim, M. J.
    Shim, W. H.
    Kim, S. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (08) : 1429 - 1436
  • [37] Fixed versus Adjustable differential pressure valves in case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportion
    Ahmed, Mansoor
    Naseer, Haseena
    Farhan, Muhammad
    Arshad, Mateen
    Ahmad, Afnan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 230
  • [38] Peer review report 1 on "Efficacy and safety of programmable shunt valves for hydrocephalus: A meta-analysis"
    Ansari, Ahmed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 37 : S394 - S394
  • [39] The effect of shunt surgery on neuropsychological performance in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peterson, Katie A.
    Savulich, George
    Jackson, Dan
    Killikelly, Clare
    Pickard, John D.
    Sahakian, Barbara J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 263 (08) : 1669 - 1677
  • [40] Radiological Features Predicting Shunt Response in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    El-Khatib, M.
    Thavarajasingam, S. G.
    Vemulapalli, K.
    Iradukunda, H. A. S.
    Vishnu, S. K.
    Borchert, R.
    Russo, S.
    Eide, P. K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110