Do stock market fear and economic policy uncertainty co-move with COVID-19 fear? Evidence from the US and UK

被引:7
|
作者
Rubbaniy, Ghulame [1 ]
Khalid, Ali Awais [2 ]
Tessema, Abiot [1 ]
Baqrain, Abdelrahman [1 ]
机构
[1] Zayed Univ, Coll Business, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Lahore, Lahore Business Sch, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
COVID-19; Wavelet COVID-19 fear index; EPU; IDEMVI; Wavelet coherence; COVID-19 health-based fear index; Implied volatility index; WAVELET COHERENCE; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1108/SEF-10-2021-0408
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to investigate co-movement of major implied volatility indices and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) indices with both the health-based fear index and market-based fear index of COVID-19 for the USA and the UK to help investors and portfolio managers in their informed investment decisions during times of infectious disease spread. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses wavelet coherence approach because it allows to observe lead-lag nonlinear relationship between two time-series variables and captures the heterogeneous perceptions of investors across time and frequency. The daily data used in this study about the USA and the UK covers major implied volatility indices, EPU, health-based fear index and market-based fear index of COVID-19 for both the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic over the period from March 3, 2020 to February 12, 2021. Findings - The results document a strong positive co-movement between implied volatility indices and two proxies of the COVID-19 fear. However, in all the cases, the infectious disease equity market volatility index (IDEMVI), the COVID-19 proxy, is more representative of the stock market and exhibits a stronger positive co-movement with volatility indicts than the COVID-19 fear index (C19FI). This study also finds that the UK's implied volatility index weakly co-moves with the C19FI compared to the USA. The results show that EPU indices of both the USA and the UK exhibit a weak or no correlation with the C19FI. However, this study finds a significant and positive co-movemmit of EPU indices with IDEMVI over the short horizon and most of the sampling period with the leading effect of IDEMVI. This study's robustness analysis using partial wavelet coherence provides further strengths to the findings. Research limitations/implications - The investment decisions and risk management of investors and portfolio managers in financial markets are affected by the new information on volatility and EPU. The findings provide insights to equity investors and portfolio managers to improve their risk management practices by incorporating how health-related risks such as COVID-19 pandemic can contribute to the market volatility and economic risks. The results are beneficial for long-term equity investors, as their investments are affected by contributing factors to the volatility in US and UK's stock markets. Originality/value - This study adds following promising values to the existing literature. First, the results complement the existing literature (Rubbaniy et at, 2021c) in documenting that type of COVID-19 proxy matters in explaining the volatility (EPU) relationships in financial markets, where market perceived fear of COVID-19 is appeared to be more pronounced than health-based fear of COVID-19. Second, the use of wavelet coherence approach allows us to observe lead-lag relationship between the selected variables, which captures the heterogeneous perceptions of investors across time and frequency and have important insights for the investors and portfolio managers. Finally, this study uses the improved data of COVID-19, stock market volatility and EPU compared to the existing studies (Sharif et al, 2020), which are too early to capture the effects of exponential spread of COVID-19 in the USA and the UK after March 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 212
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fear and hope in financial social networks: Evidence from COVID-19
    Al Guindy, Mohamed
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 46
  • [32] Economic Policy Uncertainty in China and Bitcoin Returns: Evidence From the COVID-19 Period
    Chen, Tiejun
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Cheema, Sadaf
    Koo, Chun Kwong
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [33] Do Economic Policy Uncertainty Have Ramifications on Inflation and Stock Market Performance? Evidence from Global Framework
    Mishra, Amritkant
    STUDIES IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2024, 19 (03) : 172 - 190
  • [34] IMPACT OF COVID-19: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIAN STOCK MARKET
    Lee, Kelvin Yong-Ming
    Jais, Mohamad
    Chan, Chia-Wen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2020, 21 (02): : 607 - 628
  • [35] Brand equity and the Covid-19 stock market crash: Evidence from US listed firms
    Huang, Yuxuan
    Yang, Shenggang
    Zhu, Qi
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 43
  • [36] Sectoral connectedness: New evidence from US stock market during COVID-19 pandemics
    Costa, Antonio
    Matos, Paulo
    da Silva, Cristiano
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 45
  • [37] Impact of COVID-19 and economic policy uncertainty on China's stock market returns: evidence from quantile-on-quantile and causality-in-quantiles approaches
    Ullah, Assad
    Zhao, Xinshun
    Amin, Azka
    Syed, Aamir Aijaz
    Riaz, Adeel
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 12596 - 12607
  • [38] Impact of COVID-19 and economic policy uncertainty on China’s stock market returns: evidence from quantile-on-quantile and causality-in-quantiles approaches
    Assad Ullah
    Xinshun Zhao
    Azka Amin
    Aamir Aijaz Syed
    Adeel Riaz
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 (5) : 12596 - 12607
  • [39] COVID-19 and stock market nexus: evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange
    Li, Chuanjian
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Altuntas, Mehmet
    Li, Xin
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 2351 - 2364
  • [40] Policy responses to COVID-19 and stock market reactions-An international evidence
    Deng, Tianjie
    Xu, Tracy
    Lee, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 119