Increased Variation in Esophageal Cancer Treatment and Geographic Healthcare Disparity in Michigan

被引:4
|
作者
Lee, John H. [1 ]
Arora, Akul [1 ]
Bergman, Rachel [3 ]
Gomez-Rexrode, Amalia [1 ]
Sidhom, David [1 ]
Reddy, Rishindra M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Sect Thorac, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Northwestern Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Sect Thorac Surg, TC2120-5344,1500 East Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
DELIVERY; VARIABILITY; OUTCOMES; SEX; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000819
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Regional variation in complex healthcare is shown to negatively impact health outcomes. We sought to characterize geographic variance in esophageal cancer operation in Michigan.STUDY DESIGN: Data for patients with locoregional esophageal cancer from the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program from 2000 to 2013 was analyzed. We reviewed the incidence of esophageal cancer by county and region, and those with locoregional disease receiving an esophagectomy. Counties were aggregated into existing state-level "urban vs rural" designations, regions were aggregated using the Michigan Economic Recovery Council designations, and data was analyzed with ANOVA, F-test, and chi-square test.RESULTS: Of the 8,664 patients with locoregional disease, 2,370 (27.4%) were treated with operation. Men were significantly more likely to receive esophagectomy than women (p < 0.001). Likewise, White, insured, and rural patients were more likely than non-White (p < 0.001), non-insured (p = 0.004), and urban patients (p < 0.001), respectively. There were 8 regions and 83 counties, with 61 considered rural and 22 urban. Region 1 (Detroit metro area, southeast) comprises the largest urban and suburban populations; with 4 major hospital systems it was considered the baseline standard for access to care. Regions 2 (west; p = 0.011), 3 (southwest; p = 0.024), 4 (east central; p = 0.012), 6 (northern Lower Peninsula; p = 0.008), and 8 (Upper Peninsula; p < 0.001) all had statistically significant greater variance in annual rates of operation compared with region 1. Region 8 had the largest variance and was the most rural and furthest from region 1. The variance in operation rate between urban and rural differed significantly (p = 0.005).CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in variation of care was found in rural vs urban counties, as well as in regions distant to larger hospital systems. Those of male sex, White race, rural residence, and those with health insurance were significantly more likely to receive operation. (c) 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 785
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Racial Disparity in Utilization of High-Volume Hospitals for Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
    Rehmani, Sadiq S.
    Liu, Bian
    Al-Ayoubi, Adnan M.
    Raad, Wissam
    Flores, Raja M.
    Bhora, Faiz
    Taioli, Emanuela
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 106 (02): : 346 - 353
  • [22] Geographic variation in spatial accessibility of US healthcare providers
    Naylor, Keith B.
    Tootoo, Joshua
    Yakusheva, Olga
    Shipman, Scott A.
    Bynum, Julie P. W.
    Davis, Matthew A.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [23] Changes in Geographic Variation and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Esophageal Cancer Mortality in China, 1973-2017
    Ran, Xianhui
    Zheng, Rongshou
    Zeng, Hongmei
    Zhang, Siwei
    Sun, Kexin
    Han, Bingfeng
    Wang, Shaoming
    Chen, Ru
    Li, Li
    Wei, Wenqiang
    He, Jie
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (10) : 1284 - 1293
  • [24] Geographic Variation and Sociodemographic Disparity in the Use of Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer
    Panchal, Janki M.
    Lairson, David R.
    Chan, Wenyaw
    Du, Xianglin L.
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2013, 12 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [25] Geographic variation in treatment for African American and white men with prostate cancer
    Krupski, TL
    Kwan, L
    Litwin, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 34 - 35
  • [26] Racial parity in esophageal cancer treatment at an integrated healthcare system.
    Hsu, Diana S.
    Banks, Kian C.
    Kwak, Hyunjee V.
    Chang, Amber
    Truong, Thach-Giao
    Velotta, Jeffrey B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : E16105 - E16105
  • [27] GEOGRAPHIC DISPARITY OF TREATMENT EFFECT IN THE PLATO TRIAL: FACT OR ARTIFACT?
    Kaul, Sanjay
    Diamond, George A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1100 - E1100
  • [28] Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparity in Clinical Trial Availability for Gastrointestinal Cancer
    Murphy, Samantha
    Wang, Chen-Piin
    Court, Colin
    Kitano, Mio
    Mcintyre, Caitlin A.
    Parikh, Alexander A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S242 - S244
  • [29] ESOPHAGEAL-CANCER, A GEOGRAPHIC-STUDY
    GHADIRIAN, P
    THOUEZ, JP
    SIMARD, A
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (09) : 971 - 985
  • [30] Learning from geographic variation in racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment.
    Armstrong, K
    Ravenell, K
    Putt, M
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 : 168 - 168