Development and initial evaluation of the Hearing Aid Attribute and Feature Importance Evaluation (HAFIE) questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Saleh, Hasan. K. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Folkeard, Paula [2 ]
Liao, Selina [3 ]
Scollie, Susan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Hlth & Rehabil Sci, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Natl Ctr Audiol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth Studies, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Commun Sci & Disorders, London, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Hearing aids; hearing aid selection; HAFIE; hearing aid technology; patient-oriented care; MISSING DATA; DAILY-LIFE; SATISFACTION; PREFERENCES; RATINGS; ALPHA; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2023.2253498
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop and validate a novel questionnaire aimed at providing a structured, evidence-based methodology for hearing aid recommendation and selection using self-reported importance ratings for different modern hearing aid features.DesignThe initial questionnaire items were created through a concept mapping approach that involved input from hearing aid users. Hearing care professional focus groups (n = 10) were conducted to assess questionnaire content and design, and to guide modifications. Validation of this initial 34-item version of the questionnaire was conducted using an anonymous online survey tool (Qualtrics). Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the dataset, using principal axis factoring. Questionnaire reliability and inter-item correlation were assessed. Items with low factor loading and high cross-loading were removed.Study sampleTwo hundred and eighteen adult participants with a self-reported hearing loss (median age = 48 years, range = 18-95 years) completed the questionnaire.ResultsAnalysis and item removal resulted in a 28-item questionnaire. Three factors were identified, dividing the hearing aid features into the subscales: "Advanced connectivity & streaming", "Physical attributes & usability", and "Sound quality & intelligibility".ConclusionThis study has resulted in a patient-oriented questionnaire that allows clinicians to gather patient input in a structured manner.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 721
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HEARING AID TESTS FOR PROGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF CONCEPTS FOR HEARING IMPROVEMENT
    SCHULTHE.GV
    BAUMGART.E
    PRACTICA OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1970, 32 (02): : 120 - &
  • [22] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF A DISTINCTIVE FEATURE DIFFERENCE TEST FOR HEARING-AID EVALUATION
    FEENEY, MP
    FRANKS, JR
    EAR AND HEARING, 1982, 3 (02): : 59 - 65
  • [23] The Master Hearing Aid: A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation
    Grimm, Giso
    Herzke, Tobias
    Berg, Daniel
    Hohmann, Volker
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2006, 92 (04) : 618 - 628
  • [24] Evaluation of a research hearing aid for audiological testing
    Andersen, Pernilla K.
    Jurgensen, Lukas
    Denk, Florian
    Husstedt, Hendrik
    Juergens, Tim
    Neher, Tobias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [25] Evaluation of fitting rules with a programmable hearing aid
    vandenHeuvel, J
    Goverts, ST
    Kapteyn, TS
    AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 36 (05): : 261 - 278
  • [26] Development and Evaluation of a Loudness Validation Method With Natural Signals for Hearing Aid Fitting
    Exter, Mats
    Jansen, Theresa
    Hartog, Laura
    Oetting, Dirk
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [27] MODIFIED TRADITIONAL HEARING AID EVALUATION PROCEDURE
    ORCHIK, DJ
    OYER, HJ
    JOURNAL OF AUDITORY RESEARCH, 1972, 12 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [28] QUAID: A questionnaire evaluation aid for survey methodologists
    Graesser, AC
    Wiemer-Hastings, K
    Kreuz, R
    Wiemer-Hastings, P
    Marquis, K
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2000, 32 (02): : 254 - 262
  • [29] Preschool hearing screening: Evaluation of a parental questionnaire
    Hammond, PD
    Gold, MS
    Wigg, NR
    Volkmer, RE
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 1997, 33 (06) : 528 - 530
  • [30] QUAID: A questionnaire evaluation aid for survey methodologists
    Arthur C. Graesser
    Katja Wiemer-hastings
    Roger Kreuz
    Peter Wiemer-hastings
    Kent Marquis
    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2000, 32 : 254 - 262