CytoSorb in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A rapid evidence review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Wei, Shilin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yanchun [3 ]
Zhai, Kerong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jian [2 ]
Li, Mingming [2 ]
Yang, Jianbao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Rongzhi [2 ,4 ]
Li, Yongnan [2 ,3 ]
Li, Zhenzhen [5 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Thorac Surg, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Lab Extracorporeal Life Support, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Cardiac Surg, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Extracorporeal Circulat, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
CytoSorb; coronavirus disease 2019; cytokines; cytokine hemadsorption; meta-analysis; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; SEVERE COVID-19; SARS-COV-2;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1067214
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background After its approval by the European Union in 2011, CytoSorb therapy has been applied to control cytokine storm and lower the increased levels of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators in blood. However, the efficiency of this CytoSorb treatment in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) still remains unclear. To elucidate the Cytosorb efficiency, we conducted a systematic review and single-arm proportion meta-analysis to combine all evidence available in the published literature to date, so that this comprehensive knowledge can guide clinical decision-making and future research.Methods The literature published within the period 1 December 2019 to 31 December 2021 and stored in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) was searched for all relevant studies including the cases where COVID-19 patients were treated with CytoSorb. We performed random-effects meta-analyses by R software (3.6.1) and used the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist to assess the risk of bias. Both categorical and continuous variables were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as pooled proportions for categorical variables and pooled means for continuous outcomes.Results We included 14 studies with 241 COVID-19 patients treated with CytoSorb hemadsorption. Our findings reveal that for COVID-19 patients receiving CytoSorb treatment, the combined in-hospital mortality was 42.1% (95% CI 29.5-54.6%, I-2 = 74%). The pooled incidence of adjunctive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support was 73.2%. Both the C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels decreased after CytoSorb treatment. The pooled mean of the CRP level decreased from 147.55 (95% CI 91.14-203.96) to 92.36 mg/L (95% CI 46.74-137.98), while that of IL-6 decreased from 339.49 (95% CI 164.35-514.63) to 168.83 pg/mL (95% CI 82.22-255.45).Conclusions The majority of the COVID-19 patients treated with CytoSorb received ECMO support. In-hospital mortality was 42.1% for the COVID-19 patients who had CytoSorb treatment. Both CRP and IL-6 levels decreased after Cytosorb treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regarding: "Vertical transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
    Cai, Jianghui
    Lin, Yonghong
    Wu, Meng-jun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (02) : 274 - 274
  • [32] Arrhythmias and electrocardiographic findings in Coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garcia-Zamora, Sebastian
    Lee, Sharen
    Haseeb, Sohaib
    Bazoukis, George
    Tse, Gary
    Alvarez-Garcia, Jesus
    Gul, Enes Elvin
    Cinier, Goksel
    Alexander, Bryce
    Pinto-Filho, Marcelo Martins
    Liu, Tong
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (06): : 1062 - 1074
  • [33] Impact of Corticosteroids in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outcomes Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cano, Edison J.
    Fuentes, Xavier Fonseca
    Campioli, Cristina Corsini
    O'Horo, John C.
    Abu Saleh, Omar
    Odeyemi, Yewande
    Yadav, Hemang
    Temesgen, Zelalem
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (03) : 1019 - 1040
  • [34] Active pulmonary tuberculosis and coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aggarwal, Ashutosh Nath
    Agarwal, Ritesh
    Dhooria, Sahajal
    Prasad, Kuruswamy Thurai
    Sehgal, Inderpaul Singh
    Muthu, Valliappan
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [35] Global prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 reinfection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Joyeuse Ukwishaka
    Yves Ndayishimiye
    Esmeralda Destine
    Celestin Danwang
    Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [36] Coronavirus disease 2019 in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ho, Quan Yao
    Sultana, Rehena
    Lee, Tung Lin
    Thangaraju, Sobhana
    Kee, Terence
    Htay, Htay
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 64 (10) : 593 - 602
  • [37] Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pang, Wentai
    Liu, Zhi
    Li, Nan
    Li, Yuyun
    Yang, Fengwen
    Pang, Bo
    Jin, Xinyao
    Zheng, Wenke
    Zhang, Junhua
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03)
  • [38] A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuropathic pain associated with coronavirus disease 2019
    Di Stefano, Giulia
    Falco, Pietro
    Galosi, Eleonora
    Di Pietro, Giuseppe
    Leone, Caterina
    Truini, Andrea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 27 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [39] The Incubation Period Distribution of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xin, Hualei
    Wong, Jessica Y.
    Murphy, Caitriona
    Yeung, Amy
    Ali, Sheikh Taslim
    Wu, Peng
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (12) : 2344 - 2352
  • [40] Coronavirus Disease 2019 as Cause of Viral Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*
    Karakike, Eleni
    Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J.
    Kyprianou, Miltiades
    Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin
    Pletz, Mathias W.
    Netea, Mihai G.
    Reinhart, Konrad
    Kyriazopoulou, Evdoxia
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (12) : 2042 - 2057