Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kuypers, Maybritt I. [1 ]
Veldhuis, Lars I. [2 ]
Mencl, Francis [3 ]
van Riel, Anne [4 ]
Thijssen, Wendy A. H. M.
Tromp, Ellen
Goslings, J. Carel
Ploetz, Frans B.
机构
[1] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Llocat Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Locat Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Milton Hershey Med Ctr, Hershey, PA USA
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
adverse event; analgesia; dislocation; emergency (medicine); fracture; length of stay; nerve block; pain; (procedural) sedation; patient satisfaction; DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES; HEMATOMA BLOCK; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS; AXILLARY BLOCK;
D O I
10.1002/emp2.12886
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundProcedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this systematic review is to compare these 2 techniques on pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay (LOS) in the ED. MethodsWe performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and references were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA with NBs for orthopedic reductions in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and LOS in the ED. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted data into a standardized form. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate study quality. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty and strength of the evidence. Data on pain scores were pooled using a random-effects model and are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of 6 RCTs (n = 256) were included in a qualitative review, and 4 RCTs (n = 101) were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the PSA and NB groups (P = 0.47; SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, -0.78 to 1.69; I-2 = 0.94). There were less adverse events in the NB group (0%-3.3%) compared with the PSA group (0%-20%; n = 256). LOS times were consistently shorter in the NB group (n = 215). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups (n = 196). ConclusionBased on the available evidence, NBs performed by emergency physicians are as effective as PSA in managing pain during orthopedic reductions in the ED. NBs are associated with fewer adverse events and shorter LOS in the ED. The quality of evidence is low.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Procedural sedation and analgesia for reduction of distal forearm fractures in the paediatric emergency department: A clinical survey
    Schofield, Scott
    Schutz, Jacquie
    Babl, Franz E.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2013, 25 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [12] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF DEPTH OF ANAESTHESIA MONITORING DURING PROCEDURAL SEDATION AND ANALGESIA
    Conway, A. W.
    Sutherland, J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122
  • [13] Depth of anaesthesia monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Conway, Aaron
    Sutherland, Joanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 63 : 201 - 212
  • [14] A mini-review of procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
    Homma, Yosuke
    Norii, Tatsuya
    Kanazawa, Takeshi
    Hoshino, Atsumi
    Arino, Satoshi
    Takase, Hiroshi
    Albright, Danielle
    Funakoshi, Hiraku
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [15] Postintubation Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wynia, Emily
    Baumgartner, Kevin
    Yaeger, Lauren H.
    Ancona, Rachel
    Wiltrakis, Susan
    Fuller, Brian M.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2025, 41 (04) : e19 - e26
  • [16] Ketamine-propofol (Ketofol) for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tze Yong Foo
    Norhayati Mohd Noor
    Mohd Boniami Yazid
    Mohd Hashairi Fauzi
    Shaik Farid Abdull Wahab
    Mohammad Zikri Ahmad
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 20
  • [17] Safety and efficacy of the combination of esketamine and propofol in procedural sedation/analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xiaoci
    Lin, Fong
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Xianwen
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (7-8) : 680 - 689
  • [18] Ketamine-propofol (Ketofol) for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Foo, Tze Yong
    Mohd Noor, Norhayati
    Yazid, Mohd Boniami
    Fauzi, Mohd Hashairi
    Abdull Wahab, Shaik Farid
    Ahmad, Mohammad Zikri
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [19] Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Review of Sedative Pharmacology
    Kost, Susanne
    Roy, Anita
    CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (04) : 233 - 243
  • [20] Reduction of dislocated hip prostheses using procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
    Mann, J.
    Townend, W.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 : 43 - 43