共 50 条
Randomized controlled trials of mind-body interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
被引:4
|作者:
Kaplan, Josh
[1
]
Somohano, Vanessa C.
[2
]
Zaccari, Belle
[2
,3
]
O'Neil, Maya E.
[2
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Neurol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Portland Hlth Care Syst, Portland, OR USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Psychiat, Portland, OR USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词:
mind-body;
mindfulness;
movement;
exercise;
intervention;
posttraumatic stress disorder;
complementary integrative health;
MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS;
COGNITIVE PROCESSING THERAPY;
ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE;
PROLONGED EXPOSURE;
COMBAT VETERANS;
PTSD;
SYMPTOMS;
YOGA;
TRAUMA;
PSYCHOTHERAPY;
D O I:
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219296
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Mind-body interventions (MBIs) include mindfulness-based interventions (MiBIs), meditation- and mantra-based interventions (MMIs), and movement-based interventions (MoBIs). These approaches have demonstrated preliminary efficacy in improving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. However, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have noted that this area of research is limited by inadequate comparator conditions, heterogeneity of measurement, and absence of objective outcome measures. For these reasons, an updated review of the highest-quality evidence available is warranted. We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded evidence tables for the PTSD-Repository to identify relevant studies and assess the risk of bias as follows: The search was conducted between June 2018 and June 2022, and databases included PTSDpubs (formerly PILOTS), Ovid (R) MEDLINE (R), Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase (R), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL (R)), SCOPUS, and PsycINFO (R). Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. After identifying studies and retrieving risk of bias information from the PTSD-Repository evidence tables, we extracted additional data and synthesized the evidence. The strength of evidence was rated as low for MiBIs and MMIs, largely due to contradicting results, inconsistent use of active versus passive comparators, and high risk of bias. The strength of evidence for MoBIs was rated as moderate due to individual studies consistently favoring the intervention and a relatively large number of studies and participants. Of the 26 included studies, only two included objective outcome measures. Implications for future MBI research and clinical applications for treating PTSD are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文