Application of Dexmedetomidine as an Opioid Substitute in Opioid-Free Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Dan-hong [1 ]
Xu-Shen [1 ]
Lai, Lan [1 ]
Chen, Yan-jun [1 ]
Liu, Ke [1 ]
Shen, Qi-hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiaxing Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 1882 Zhonghuan South Rd, Jiaxing 315800, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Opioid-free anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS; INTRAOPERATIVE INFUSION; INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; STRESS-RESPONSE; ADULT PATIENTS; REMIFENTANIL; FENTANYL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Opioid-based general anesthesia was previously used to alleviate perioperative pain; however, several complications associated with using anesthesia have raised several concerns. Various studies have investigated the application prospect of using opioid-free general anesthesia, such as dexmedetomidine, as an opioid substitute. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore and highlight the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for opioid-free anesthesia. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We screened for suitable clinical trials from electronic databases, including "PubMed," "Cochrane Library," "EMBASE," and "Web of Science." Eligible trials were included in this meta-analysis. Methods: The quality of the screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was determined using the risk of bias assessment criteria by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used the "Review Manager 5.3" and "Stata 10.0" software to perform the meta-analysis. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" approach. Results: For the analysis, we included 32 RCTs encompassing 2,509 patients. In the opioid-free group, the 2-hour postoperative pain score of patients (mean difference =-0.53, 95% CI:-1.00,-0.07; P = 0.02, I2=78%) was significantly lower compared to those in the opioid-based group. In addition, several patients required rescue analgesia (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.84, P < 0.05, I2 = 71%) and opioids postsurgery. However, the duration of extubation and postanesthesia care unit, as well as the incidences of bradycardia, were high in patients receiving dexmedetomidine as opioid-free general anesthesia. Limitations: Subgroup analysis for different anesthesia-maintaining drugs had not been conducted. The heterogeneity did not reduce after subgroup analysis. Different doses of dexmedetomidine had not been evaluated. Conclusions: These findings indicate that opioid-free general anesthesia based on dexmedetomidine could be effective; however, prolonged extubation time and cardiovascular complications are a few risks associated with dexmedetomidine.
引用
收藏
页码:E635 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Opioid-free anesthesia for adenotonsillectomy in children
    Mann, Glenn E.
    Flamer, Steven Z.
    Nair, Singh
    Maher, James N.
    Cowan, Brandon
    Streiff, Agathe
    Adams, David
    Shaparin, Naum
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [22] Effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Zhang, Yanan
    Ma, Dandan
    Lang, Bao
    Zang, Chuanbo
    Sun, Zenggang
    Ren, Shengjie
    Chen, Huayong
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (38) : E35126
  • [23] Opioid-Free Analgesia for Supratentorial Craniotomies: A Systematic Review
    Darmawikarta, Denise
    Sourour, Michel
    Couban, Rachel
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Reddy, Kesava K., V
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 46 (04) : 415 - 422
  • [24] Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Improves Anaesthesia Recovery when Compared with that of Opioid-Based Anaesthesia. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Malo-Manso, Alfredo
    Fontaneda-Heredia, Ana
    Romero-Molina, Salvador
    Sepulveda-Haro, Enrique
    Escalona-Belmonte, Juan Jose
    Guerrero-Orriach, Jose Luis
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 30 (14) : 1667 - 1681
  • [25] Analgesic impact of intra-operative opioids vs. opioid-free anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Frauenknecht, J.
    Kirkham, K. R.
    Jacot-Guillarmod, A.
    Albrecht, E.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 74 (05) : 651 - 662
  • [26] A Retrospective Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia versus Opioid Anesthesia for General Cesarean Section
    Enten, Garrett
    Shenouda, Mina A.
    Samuels, David
    Fowler, Naomi
    Balouch, Maha
    Camporesi, Enrico
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [27] Opioid-free anesthesia: a different regard to anesthesia practice
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Estebe, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (05) : 556 - 561
  • [28] Opioid-free anesthesia—dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in erector spinae plane block: a case series
    Antonio Coviello
    Danilo Esposito
    Roberta Galletta
    Alfredo Maresca
    Giuseppe Servillo
    [J]. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 15
  • [29] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stéphane Hublet
    Marianne Galland
    Julie Navez
    Patrizia Loi
    Jean Closset
    Patrice Forget
    Pierre Lafère
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 22 (1)
  • [30] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stephane, Hublet
    Marianne, Galland
    Julie, Navez
    Patrizia, Loi
    Jean, Closset
    Patrice, Forget
    Pierre, Lafere
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01):