Application of Dexmedetomidine as an Opioid Substitute in Opioid-Free Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Dan-hong [1 ]
Xu-Shen [1 ]
Lai, Lan [1 ]
Chen, Yan-jun [1 ]
Liu, Ke [1 ]
Shen, Qi-hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiaxing Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 1882 Zhonghuan South Rd, Jiaxing 315800, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Opioid-free anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS; INTRAOPERATIVE INFUSION; INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; STRESS-RESPONSE; ADULT PATIENTS; REMIFENTANIL; FENTANYL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Opioid-based general anesthesia was previously used to alleviate perioperative pain; however, several complications associated with using anesthesia have raised several concerns. Various studies have investigated the application prospect of using opioid-free general anesthesia, such as dexmedetomidine, as an opioid substitute. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore and highlight the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for opioid-free anesthesia. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We screened for suitable clinical trials from electronic databases, including "PubMed," "Cochrane Library," "EMBASE," and "Web of Science." Eligible trials were included in this meta-analysis. Methods: The quality of the screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was determined using the risk of bias assessment criteria by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used the "Review Manager 5.3" and "Stata 10.0" software to perform the meta-analysis. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" approach. Results: For the analysis, we included 32 RCTs encompassing 2,509 patients. In the opioid-free group, the 2-hour postoperative pain score of patients (mean difference =-0.53, 95% CI:-1.00,-0.07; P = 0.02, I2=78%) was significantly lower compared to those in the opioid-based group. In addition, several patients required rescue analgesia (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.84, P < 0.05, I2 = 71%) and opioids postsurgery. However, the duration of extubation and postanesthesia care unit, as well as the incidences of bradycardia, were high in patients receiving dexmedetomidine as opioid-free general anesthesia. Limitations: Subgroup analysis for different anesthesia-maintaining drugs had not been conducted. The heterogeneity did not reduce after subgroup analysis. Different doses of dexmedetomidine had not been evaluated. Conclusions: These findings indicate that opioid-free general anesthesia based on dexmedetomidine could be effective; however, prolonged extubation time and cardiovascular complications are a few risks associated with dexmedetomidine.
引用
收藏
页码:E635 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opioid-free anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feenstra, Minke L.
    Jansen, Simone
    Eshuis, Wietse J.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Hermanides, Jeroen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 90
  • [2] Opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiovascular and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Mathew, Dave M.
    Fusco, Peter J.
    Varghese, Kathryn S.
    Awad, Ahmed K.
    Vega, Eamon
    Mathew, Serena M.
    Polizzi, Mia
    George, Jerrin
    Mathew, Christopher S.
    Thomas, Jeremiah J.
    Calixte, Rose
    Ahmed, Adham
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 27 (03) : 162 - 170
  • [3] Dexmedetomidine may be favorable for opioid-free anesthesia
    Chen, I-Wen
    Wang, Wei-Ting
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 90
  • [4] Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    El-Kefraoui, Charbel
    Olleik, Ghadeer
    Chay, Marc-Aurele
    Kouyoumdjian, Araz
    Nguyen-Powanda, Philip
    Rajabiyazdi, Fateme
    Do, Uyen
    Derksen, Alexa
    Landry, Tara
    Amar-Zifkin, Alexandre
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V.
    Martel, Marc-Olivier
    Baldini, Gabriele
    Feldman, Liane
    Fiore Jr, Julio F.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [5] Effect of opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zheng
    Li, Chengwei
    Xu, Lin
    Sun, Xinyi
    Lin, Xiaojie
    Wei, Penghui
    Li, Jianjun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [6] Opioid-Free Anesthesia Benefit-Risk Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Salome, Arthur
    Harkouk, Hakim
    Fletcher, Dominique
    Martinez, Valeria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [7] Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Fiore, Julio F., Jr.
    El-Kefraoui, Charbel
    Chay, Marc-Aurele
    Nguyen-Powanda, Philip
    Do, Uyen
    Olleik, Ghadeer
    Rajabiyazdi, Fateme
    Kouyoumdjian, Araz
    Derksen, Alexa
    Landry, Tara
    Amar-Zifkin, Alexandre
    Bergeron, Amy
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram, V
    Martel, Marc
    Lee, Lawrence
    Baldini, Gabriele
    Feldman, Liane S.
    [J]. LANCET, 2022, 399 (10343): : 2280 - 2293
  • [8] Opioid-free anesthesia
    Beloeil, Helene
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [9] The effects of naltrexone on retention in treatment and being opioid-free in opioid-dependent people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zangiabadian, Moein
    Golmohammadi, Saeid
    Nejadghaderi, Seyed Aria
    Zahmatkesh, Mohammad Mahdi
    Nasiri, Mohammad Javad
    Sadeghian, Majid
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Opioid-free and opioid-sparing anesthesia
    Siu, Eric Y.
    Moon, Tiffany S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2020, 58 (02) : 34 - 41