Who or what really counts? The application of BASEClass for stakeholder evaluation and classification

被引:2
|
作者
Khedmatgozar, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Namdarian, Leila [2 ]
Rasuli, Behrooz [2 ]
机构
[1] Iranian Res Inst Informat Sci & Technol IranDoc, Informat Technol Res Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iranian Res Inst Informat Sci & Technol IranDoc, Informat & Soc Res Dept, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Theory of stakeholder identification and salience (TSIS); Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder communication; Stakeholders classification; Stakeholders evaluation; Stakeholders prioritization; BASEClass; PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT; SALIENCE; IDENTIFICATION; DYNAMICS; QUALITY; LIKERT; MODEL; PRIORITIZATION; PERSPECTIVE; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1108/MD-06-2022-0805
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a framework for categorizing and evaluating stakeholders that addresses the key five constraints of The Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience (TSIS), including (1) binary attributes, (2) heterogeneous stakeholders in each category, (3) ignoring stakeholder-organization relationship, (4) ignoring stakeholders' communication frequency and (5) ignoring fringe stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachIn the first step, a set of solutions for the limitations and constraints of TSIS was extracted by holding three rounds of the Delphi method with the participation of 42 senior and middle Iranian managers in various organizations and based on it, "Basic Analysis for Stakeholder Evaluation and Classification" (BASEClass) was developed as an enhanced theoretical and empirical framework for stakeholder analysis. In the second Step BASEClass is validated by conducting an empirical study in an organization with the participation of 46 managers, experts and specialists.FindingsBASEClass is an enhanced theoretical and methodological framework for classifying stakeholders based on the three primary attributes of legitimacy, power and urgency, and also the communication quantity as a complementary attribute in a 3D cubical schema, prioritizing stakeholders in several cubes based on one of the multi-criteria group decision-making methods. Originality/valueBASEClass effectively reduces the mentioned limitations and constraints of TSIS and as a result can improve the effectiveness of strategies for dealing with different stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1966 / 1997
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cluster seizures - what really counts?
    Szklener, S.
    Korchut, A.
    Rejdak, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 384 - 384
  • [22] Who and What Really Count? An Examination of Stakeholder Salience in Not-for-Profit Service Delivery Organizations
    Chen, Jinhua
    Harrison, Graeme
    Jiao, Lu
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 77 (04) : 813 - 828
  • [23] ESSAY-WRITING - WHAT REALLY COUNTS
    NORTON, LS
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 1990, 20 (04) : 411 - 442
  • [24] Nova Scotians count what really counts
    McKay, J
    Bobechko, L
    ALTERNATIVES JOURNAL, 2001, 27 (04): : 5 - 5
  • [25] What Really Counts? Taking Measure of Measures
    Billings, J. Andrew
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [26] SELECTING MEDICAL HOUSEOFFICERS - WHAT REALLY COUNTS
    YOUNG, MJ
    HOLLOWAY, JJ
    SRIVISTAVA, S
    WOOLLISCROFT, JO
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (02): : A736 - A736
  • [27] WHAT REALLY COUNTS + CURRENT TRENDS IN DANCE
    KOLLINGER, B
    BALLETT INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 8 (12): : 48 - 53
  • [28] TEACHING DESIGN, ITS WHO AND HOW THAT REALLY COUNTS
    BOARDMAN, TL
    ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1971, 62 (01): : 61 - &
  • [29] A message for our younger colleagues - And what really counts
    Fabian, Nelson
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2007, 69 (06) : 94 - +
  • [30] Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy What Really Counts?
    Gembruch, Oliver
    Jabbarli, Ramazan
    Rashidi, Ali
    Chihi, Mehdi
    Hetze, Susann
    Barthel, Lennart
    Toplak, Adrian
    El Hindy, Nicolai
    Sure, Ulrich
    Dammann, Philipp
    Ozkan, Neriman
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (05) : 294 - 299