Asymmetric volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy: Dynamics and determinants

被引:2
|
作者
Wan, Yang [1 ]
Song, Yuncheng [2 ]
Zhang, Xinqian [2 ]
Yin, Zhichao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
cryptocurrency; energy; dynamic equicorrelation; volatility connectedness; dynamic model averaging; COMMODITY; NETWORK; BITCOIN;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1115200
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We explore the dynamics and determinants of volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy. We employed a block dynamic equicorrelation model and a group volatility connectedness measurement to measure the cross-equicorrelation and volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy. We also adopted dynamic model averaging to identify the time-varying drivers. The results suggest that changes in cross-equicorrelation between the two groups were affected by influential global events and increased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Volatilities were transmitted in both directions between cryptocurrencies and energy, but the transmission from energy to cryptocurrencies is by far the strongest. The driver identification implies that the factors related to cryptocurrencies and global financial markets had important roles in explaining the volatility connectedness from cryptocurrencies to energy in some periods after the COVID-19 pandemic, but the effects were marginal. In contrast, factors such as electricity consumption, cryptocurrency turnovers, and VIX were important in affecting the volatility connectedness from energy to cryptocurrencies, and the effects depended on factors and changed over time.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distant or close cousins: Connectedness between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies volatilities
    Andrada-Felix, Julian
    Fernandez-Perez, Adrian
    Sosvilla-Rivero, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2020, 67
  • [42] Does volatility connectedness across major cryptocurrencies behave the same at different frequencies? A portfolio risk analysis
    Mensi, Walid
    Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed
    Al-Jarrah, Idries Mohammad Wanas
    Vo, Xuan Vinh
    Kang, Sang Hoon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 76 : 96 - 113
  • [43] Connectedness between cryptocurrencies and foreign exchange markets: Implication for risk management
    Chemkha, Rahma
    BenSaida, Ahmed
    Ghorbel, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 59
  • [44] Asymmetric connectedness on the US stock market: Bad and good volatility spillovers
    Barunik, Jozef
    Kocenda, Evzen
    Vacha, Lukas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2016, 27 : 55 - 78
  • [45] Time and frequency dynamic connectedness between cryptocurrencies and financial assets in China
    Li, Zhenghui
    Mo, Bin
    Nie, He
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 86 : 46 - 57
  • [46] Asymmetric Volatility Connectedness Among G7 Stock Markets
    Lee, Woo Suk
    Lee, Hahn Shik
    [J]. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (01): : 87 - 103
  • [47] What drives the return and volatility spillover between DeFis and cryptocurrencies?
    Assaf, Ata
    Demir, Ender
    Ersan, Oguz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [48] Macro determinants of volatility and volatility spillover in energy markets
    Karali, Berna
    Ramirez, Octavio A.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 : 413 - 421
  • [49] Asymmetric Dynamics in Stock Market Volatility
    Karunanayake, Indika
    Valadkhani, Abbas
    [J]. ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2011, 30 (02): : 279 - 287
  • [50] Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies
    Dias, Rui
    Alexandre, Paulo
    Teixeira, Nuno
    Chambino, Mariana
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (13)