Some writing disruptions between narrative as literacy practice and peer review

被引:0
|
作者
Arango, Hilda Yaneth Zuleta [1 ]
Alzate, Natalia Andrea Alzate [2 ]
Vasquez, David Alberto Londono [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Luis Amigo, Educ, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Univ Catolica Luis Amigo, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Inst Univ Envigado, Ciencias Sociales Ninez & Juventud, Envigado, Colombia
来源
PRAXIS-COLOMBIA | 2023年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
language teaching; literacy practice; narrative; peer review;
D O I
10.21676/23897856.4695
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This review article presents the conceptual contributions that have emerged as a result of academic research carried out at the international, national and local levels around the narrative, literacy practices and peer review, pointing to the identification of the possible disruptions between them and some meeting points between these categories. For this, a qualitative bibliographic revision, and a comprehensive hermeneutical analysis, of a descriptive type, were carried out. The material was made up of the publications that emerged from research between 2016 and 2021, found in databases such as: Dialnet, Scielo and EBSCO. The systematization and analysis of the material was done through a previously validated matrix. The disruptions identified were located from the sociocultural perspective of school writing that demarcated tensions and theoretical and practical meeting points.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 504
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of narrative writing in improving professional practice
    Attard, K.
    EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2012, 20 (01) : 161 - 175
  • [22] What is the narrative for practice? A review of recommendations on feedback and a guide to writing impactful practical implications
    Dello Russo, Silvia
    Mirfakhar, Atieh S.
    Miraglia, Mariella
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2023, 72 (04): : 1624 - 1652
  • [23] Peer Assessment of SOAP Note Writing with Calibrated Peer Review
    Fravel, Michelle
    Russell, Jae-Eun
    Knockel, Laura
    Reist, Jeffrey
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 37 (12): : E158 - E158
  • [24] Writing knowledge: Wikipedia, public review, and peer review
    Cummings, Robert E.
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (05) : 950 - 962
  • [25] Peer Review in Practice: Introduction
    Kaspar, Wendi
    Borgerding, Jodie
    Hodge, Megan
    Marino, Bill
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2017, 78 (01): : 2 - 7
  • [26] PRACTICE PEER REVIEW (PPR)
    de Beer, W.
    Harvey, R.
    Salmon, L.
    Galley, N.
    Hans, D.
    Mitchell, D.
    Lloyd, B.
    Topp, J.
    Young, G.
    O'Connor, M.
    Sinha, S.
    Sahoo, S.
    Peiris, T.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 57 (01): : 18 - 18
  • [27] PRACTICE PEER REVIEW (PPR)
    de Beer, W.
    Harvey, R.
    Salmon, L.
    Galley, N.
    Hans, D.
    Mitchell, D.
    Lloyd, B.
    Topp, J.
    Young, G.
    O'Connor, M.
    Sinha, S.
    Sahoo, S.
    Peiris, T.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 56 (1_SUPPL): : 11 - 11
  • [28] The History and Practice of Peer Review
    Chapelle, Francis H.
    GROUNDWATER, 2014, 52 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [29] On editorial practice and peer review
    Shahar, Eyal
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (04) : 699 - 701
  • [30] Literacy in Practice: Writing in Private, Public, and Working Lives
    Esposito, Laurie Shirley
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2016, 63 (04) : 387 - 387