Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Garcha, Ivneet [1 ]
Phillips, Susan Paula [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Family Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
primary care; preventive medicine; social medicine; cardiology;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067638
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention relies on timely identification of and intervention for individuals at risk. Risk assessment models such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) have been shown to over-estimate or under-estimate risk in certain groups, such as socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) could be used to address such equity gaps to improve risk assessment; however, critical appraisal is warranted before ML-informed clinical decision-making is implemented.Methods and analysisThis study will employ an equity-lens to identify sources of bias (ie, race/ethnicity, gender and social stratum) in ML algorithms designed to improve CVD risk assessment relative to the FRS. A comprehensive literature search will be completed using MEDLINE, Embase and IEEE to answer the research question: do AI algorithms that are designed for the estimation of CVD risk and that compare performance with the FRS address the sources of bias inherent in the FRS? No study date filters will be imposed on the search, but English language filters will be applied. Studies describing a specific algorithm or ML approach that provided a risk assessment output for coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation), stroke or a global CVD risk score, and that compared performance with the FRS are eligible for inclusion. Papers describing algorithms for the diagnosis rather than the prevention of CVD will be excluded. A structured narrative review analysis of included studies will be completed.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was not required. Ethics exemption was formally received from the General Research Ethics Board at Queen's University. The completed systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and parts of the work will be presented at relevant conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence in Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Literature Review
    Ogie, Robert Ighodaro
    Rho, Juan Castilla
    Clarke, Rodney J.
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT (ICT-DM), 2018,
  • [22] The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review
    Gonzalez-Castro, Ana
    Leiros-Rodriguez, Raquel
    Prada-Garcia, Camino
    Benitez-Andrades, Jose Alberto
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [23] A systematic literature review on risk perception of Artificial Narrow Intelligence
    Krieger, Jonas Benjamin
    Bouder, Frederic
    Wibral, Matthias
    Almeida, Rui Jorge
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [24] Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women - The Reynolds Risk Score
    Ridker, Paul M.
    Buring, Julie E.
    Rifai, Nader
    Cook, Nancy R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (06): : 611 - 619
  • [25] Cardiovascular risk assessment in HIV-infected male patients: a comparison of Framingham, SCORE, PROCAM and DAD risk equations
    Pirs, Mateja
    Jug, Borut
    Erzen, Barbara
    Sabovic, Miso
    Karner, Primoz
    Poljak, Mario
    Tomazic, Janez
    ACTA DERMATOVENEROLOGICA ALPINA PANNONICA ET ADRIATICA, 2014, 23 (03): : 43 - 47
  • [26] INCREASED CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS C: ASSESSMENT BY FRAMINGHAM SCORE AND SERUM INFLAMMATORY MARKERS
    Kappel, Camila R.
    Siqueira, Erika Rabelo F.
    Lima, Vicencia M.
    Stefano, Jose Tadeu
    Michalczuk, Matheus T.
    Marini, Stela S.
    Barbeiro, Hermes V.
    Soriano, Francisco G.
    Pereira, Leila
    Oliveira, Claudia P.
    Carrilho, Flair J.
    Alvares-da-Silva, Mario R.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 52 (04) : 691A - 691A
  • [27] Assessment of cardiovascular risk in population groups.: Comparison of Score system and Framingham in hypertensive patients
    Cosin Aguilar, J.
    Hernandiz Martinez, A.
    Rodriguez Padial, L.
    Zamorano Gomez, J. L.
    Aristegui Urrestarazu, R.
    Armada Pelaez, B.
    Aguilar Llopis, A.
    Masramon Morell, X.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2006, 206 (04): : 182 - 187
  • [28] THE IMPACT OF SEVERITY OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK ASSESSMENT USING FRAMINGHAM RISK SCORE- A PILOT STUDY
    Pandey, Nidhi
    Sahu, Vijaya
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (70): : 12179 - 12183
  • [29] Cardiovascular risk assessment in an HIV cohort: a comparison of QRISK2, JBS3, the Framingham Risk Score and the D:A:D score
    Killeen, P.
    Duncan, A.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2016, 17 : 40 - 40
  • [30] Artificial intelligence image-based prediction models in IBD exhibit high risk of bias: A systematic review
    Liu, Xiaoxuan
    Reigle, James
    Prasath, V. B. Surya
    Dhaliwal, Jasbir
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2024, 171