Empirical and process-based models predict enhanced beech growth in European mountains under climate change scenarios: A multimodel approach

被引:12
|
作者
Bosela, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Rubio-Cuadrado, Alvaro [1 ,3 ]
Marcis, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Merganicova, Katarina [4 ,23 ]
Fleischer, Peter, Jr. [1 ,5 ]
Forrester, David I. [6 ]
Uhl, Enno [7 ]
Avdagic, Admir [8 ]
Bellan, Michal [9 ]
Bielak, Kamil [10 ]
Bravo, Felipe [11 ]
Coll, Lluis [12 ]
Cseke, Klara [13 ]
del Rio, Miren [14 ]
Dinca, Lucian [15 ]
Dobor, Laura
Drozdowski, Stanislaw
Giammarchi, Francesco [16 ]
Gomoryova, Erika [1 ]
Ibrahimspahic, Aida
Kasanin-Grubin, Milica [17 ]
Klopcic, Matija [18 ]
Kurylyak, Viktor [19 ]
Montes, Fernando [14 ]
Pach, Maciej [20 ]
Ruiz-Peinado, Ricardo [14 ]
Skrzyszewski, Jerzy [20 ]
Stajic, Branko [21 ]
Stojanovic, Dejan [22 ]
Svoboda, Miroslav [23 ]
Tonon, Giustino [16 ]
Versace, Soraya [24 ]
Mitrovic, Suzana [25 ]
Zlatanov, Tzvetan [26 ]
Pretzsch, Hans
Tognetti, Roberto [24 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Zvolen, TG Masaryka 24, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[2] Natl Forest Ctr, TG Masaryka 22, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Montes Forestal & Medio N, Dept Sistemas & Recursos Nat, Ciudad Univ S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Landscape Ecol, POB 254,Stefanikova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia
[5] Adm Tatra Natl Pk, Tatranska Lomnica 05960, Vysoke Tatry, Slovakia
[6] CSIRO Land & Water, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[7] Tech Univ Munich, Forest Growth & Yield Sci, TUM Sch Life Sci, Hans Carl von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[8] Univ Sarajevo, Dept Forest Management & Urban greenery, Fac Forestry, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herceg
[9] Mendel Univ Brno, Dept Forest Ecol, Zemedeska 3, Brno 6130, Czech Republic
[10] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Dept Silviculture, Warsaw, Poland
[11] Univ Valladolid, Inst Univ Invest Gest Forestal Sostenible, IuFOR, Valladolid, Spain
[12] Univ Lleida, Dept Agr & Forest Sci & Engn, JRU CTFC AGROTECNIO, Lleida, Spain
[13] Univ Sopron, Forest Res Inst, Sarvar, Hungary
[14] CSIC, Inst Ciencias Forestales ICIFOR INIA, Madrid, Spain
[15] Natl Inst Res & Dev Forestry Marin Dracea, Voluntari, Romania
[16] Free Univ Bolzano, Fac Sci & Technol, Piazza Univ 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[17] Univ Belgrade, Inst Chem Technol & Met, Njegoseva 12, Belgrade, Serbia
[18] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Forestry & Renewable Forest Resources, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[19] Ukrainian Natl Forestry Univ, Gen Chuprynka Str 103, UA-79057 Lvov, Ukraine
[20] Univ Agr, Fac Forestry, Dept Ecol & Silviculture, Krakow, Poland
[21] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Dept Forestry & Nat Protect, Belgrade, Serbia
[22] Univ Novi Sad, Inst Lowland Forestry & Environm, Novi Sad, Serbia
[23] Czech Univ Life Sci, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[24] Univ Molise, Dept Agr Environm & Food Sci, Molise, Italy
[25] Inst Forestry, Kneza Viseslava 3, Belgrade 11030, Serbia
[26] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Res, Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
Dendrochronology; Ecosystem dynamics; European beech; Global climate change; Process-based growth model; Tree growth; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; BIOME-BGC MODEL; FAGUS-SYLVATICA; CARBON ACCUMULATION; TERRESTRIAL CARBON; FORESTS; STAND; SELECTION; DYNAMICS; 3-PG;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Process-based models and empirical modelling techniques are frequently used to (i) explore the sensitivity of tree growth to environmental variables, and (ii) predict the future growth of trees and forest stands under climate change scenarios. However, modelling approaches substantially influence predictions of the sensitivity of trees to environmen-tal factors. Here, we used tree-ring width (TRW) data from 1630 beech trees from a network of 70 plots established across European mountains to build empirical predictive growth models using various modelling approaches. In addi-tion, we used 3-PG and Biome-BGCMuSo process-based models to compare growth predictions with derived empirical models. Results revealed similar prediction errors (RMSE) across models ranging between 3.71 and 7.54 cm2 of basal area increment (BAI). The models explained most of the variability in BAI ranging from 54 % to 87 %. Selected explan-atory variables (despite being statistically highly significant) and the pattern of the growth sensitivity differed between models substantially. We identified only five factors with the same effect and the same sensitivity pattern in all empir-ical models: tree DBH, competition index, elevation, Gini index of DBH, and soil silt content. However, the sensitivity to most of the climate variables was low and inconsistent among the empirical models. Both empirical and process -based models suggest that beech in European mountains will, on average, likely experience better growth conditions under both 4.5 and 8.5 RCP scenarios. The process-based models indicated that beech may grow better across European mountains by 1.05 to 1.4 times in warmer conditions. The empirical models identified several drivers of tree growth that are not included in the current process-based models (e.g., different nutrients) but may have a sub-stantial effect on final results, particularly if they are limiting factors. Hence, future development of process-based models may build upon our findings to increase their ability to correctly capture ecosystem dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of four process-based models and a statistical regression model to predict growth of Eucalyptus globulus plantations
    Miehle, Peter
    Battaglia, Michael
    Sands, Peter J.
    Forrester, David I.
    Feikema, Paul M.
    Livesley, Stephen J.
    Morris, Jim D.
    Arndt, Stefan K.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2009, 220 (05) : 734 - 746
  • [32] A sparse empirical Bayes approach to high-dimensional Gaussian process-based varying coefficient models
    Kim, Myungjin
    Goh, Gyuhyeong
    STAT, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [33] A tree- and climate-dependent growth model to predict mature annual cork thickness under different climate change scenarios
    Paulo, Joana Amaral
    Firmino, Paulo Neves
    Tome, Margarida
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9 (03) : 3329 - 3342
  • [34] A tree- and climate-dependent growth model to predict mature annual cork thickness under different climate change scenarios
    Joana Amaral Paulo
    Paulo Neves Firmino
    Margarida Tomé
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9 : 3329 - 3342
  • [35] The effect of climate change on economic growth in European countries: an empirical evidence from Panel ARDL approach
    Asma khoualfia
    Wajdi Bardi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32 (2) : 736 - 748
  • [36] Remote-sensing based approach to forecast habitat quality under climate change scenarios
    Requena-Mullor, Juan M.
    Lopez, Enrique
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Alcaraz-Segura, Domingo
    Castro, Hermelindo
    Reyes, Andres
    Cabello, Javier
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [37] Comparing process-based models with the inventory approach to predict CH4 emission of livestock enteric fermentation
    Zhang, Jianan
    Chen, Lan
    Chen, Yizhao
    Groisman, Pavel
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (03)
  • [38] Exploring dynamics of riverine phosphorus exports under future climate change using a process-based catchment model
    Tong Yindong
    Chen Ziwei
    Wen Yingting
    Qi Miao
    Wang Yuyi
    Zhu Mengshi
    Lin Yan
    Sha Jian
    Zhang Hefeng
    Wang Ruonan
    Wang Xuejun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 605
  • [39] Response of tree growth to a changing climate in boreal central Canada: A comparison of empirical, process-based, and hybrid modelling approaches
    Girardin, Martin P.
    Raulier, Frederic
    Bernier, Pierre Y.
    Tardif, Jacques C.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 213 (02) : 209 - 228
  • [40] Combining process-based and correlative models improves predictions of climate change effects on Schistosoma mansoni transmission in eastern Africa
    Stensgaard, Anna-Sofie
    Booth, Mark
    Nikulin, Grigory
    McCreesh, Nicky
    GEOSPATIAL HEALTH, 2016, 11 : 94 - 101