Non-state shareholder governance and corporate innovation efficiency under the background of mixed ownership reform: evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Chengjun [1 ]
Liu, Songqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Tech Univ, Sch Business Adm, Huludao 125105, Peoples R China
关键词
Non-state shareholders; mixed ownership reform; innovation efficiency; board governance; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; CEO PAY; COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2290165
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Based on data from Chinese SOEs that participated in the mixed ownership reform between 2013 and 2020, mixed OLS and fixed effects models are used to empirically test the impact of non-state-owned shareholders' participation in board governance on the innovation effectiveness of SOEs in the mixed ownership reform. The empirical results show that: the proportion of non-state shareholder-appointed boards can significantly improve the innovation efficiency of SOEs, and the findings still hold after a series of robustness tests. The impact of the governance of non-state shareholders on the innovation efficiency of SOEs is heterogeneous in two aspects: equity incentives for managers and knowledge absorption capacity. This paper enriches the research on the governance of non-state shareholder boards under mixed ownership reform. It provides empirical evidence and policy implications for optimising the innovation efficiency of SOEs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate governance, institutional ownership, and stock liquidity of SMEs: evidence from China
    Liu, Wei
    Suzuki, Yoshihisa
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [32] Discussion of 'Government ownership, corporate governance and tax aggressiveness: evidence from China'
    Chen, Chen
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2013, 53 (04): : 1053 - 1059
  • [33] Mixed-ownership reform and factor misallocation: Evidence from China
    Peng, Ping
    Zhu, Xingwang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [34] Shareholder heterogeneity, board dicisionmaking process and ambidextrous corporate innovation: evidence from China
    Wu, Lidong
    Wang, Qingyun
    Xue, Kunkun
    [J]. NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 13 (04) : 648 - 665
  • [35] Retail shareholder activism and corporate innovation: evidence from investor interaction platforms in China
    Dang Y.
    Sun J.
    Zhao Y.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2024, 58 (2) : 1827 - 1858
  • [36] Earnings guidance: market pressure or corporate governance? Evidence from corporate innovation in China
    Yang, Daoguang
    Wang, Jiani
    Chen, Hanwen
    [J]. NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 12 (03) : 409 - 433
  • [37] An Empirical Research on Mixed-Ownership Reform and SOE Innovation: Evidence from China's Industrial Enterprises
    王业雯
    陈林
    [J]. China Economist, 2018, (03) : 42 - 52
  • [38] Corporate fraud under pyramidal ownership structure: Evidence from a regulatory reform
    Choi, Daewoung
    Gam, Yong Kyu
    Shin, Hojong
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2020, 45
  • [39] Mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and executive compensation stickiness: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Rongwu
    Lin, Yanzhen
    Zhang, Wenjia
    Du, Jianjun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 95
  • [40] The Impact of Private Enterprises' participation in State-Owned Enterprises Mixed Ownership Reform on Corporate Performance under the Background of Sharing Economy
    Zhou Zhiqiang
    Xu Xinyu
    Huang Lirong
    Liu Shengzong
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS (ICDSBA 2018), 2018, : 417 - 422