Performance evaluation of ANN and ANFIS models for estimating velocity and pressure in water distribution networks

被引:1
|
作者
Rashid, Abu [1 ]
Kumari, Sangeeta [1 ]
机构
[1] NIT, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
关键词
ANFIS; ANN; Bayesian Regularization; Levenberg-Marquardt; scaled conjugate gradient; sensitivity analysis; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; LEAKAGE DETECTION; DEMAND; PREDICTION; FAILURE; FORECAST; QUALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2023.224
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, two artificial intelligence techniques: (1) artificial neural networks (ANNs) using different algorithms such as Lavenberg-Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) and (2) Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) are used to predict velocity and pressure for Gadhra (DMA-5) real water distribution network (WDN), East Singhbhum district of Jharkhand, India. In case 1, flow rate and diameter are used as independent variables to predict velocity. In case 2, elevation and demand are used as independent variables to predict pressure. 80% of the data are used to train, test, and validate the ANN and ANFIS prediction models, while 20% of the data are used to evaluate data-driven models. Sensitivity analysis is performed in ANN-LM to understand the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The performance indices of RMSE, MAE, and R2 are evaluated for ANN and ANFIS for different combinations. The ANN-LM, with 2-16-1 architecture, is found as a superior to predict velocity and ANN-LM with architecture 2-17-1 is found as a superior to predict pressure. ANN-LM had the best prediction in estimating velocity (RMSE = 0.0189, MAE = 0.0122, R2 = 0.9568) and pressure (RMSE = 0.3244, MAE = 0.2176, R2 = 0.9773).
引用
收藏
页码:3925 / 3949
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sum-of-delay models for pressure control in Water Distribution Networks
    Galuppini, Giacomo
    Creaco, Enrico
    Magni, Lalo
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2021, 113
  • [22] Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS modeling ability in the prediction of AISI 1050 steel machining performance
    Sada, S. O.
    Ikpeseni, S. C.
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [23] Comparative efficacy of ANN and ANFIS models in estimating biosurfactant production produced by Klebseilla sp FKOD36
    Ahmad, Zulfiqar
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Crowley, David
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Yousefi, Marziye
    Imran, Muhammad
    Hussain, Sabir
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (01) : 353 - 363
  • [24] Technical performance evaluation of water distribution networks based on EPANET
    Muranho, J.
    Ferreira, A.
    Sousa, J.
    Gomes, A.
    Marques, A. Sa
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND CONTROL FOR THE WATER INDUSTRY, CCWI2013, 2014, 70 : 1201 - 1210
  • [25] Estimating physical unaccounted for water (UFW) in distribution networks using simulation models and GIS
    Motiee, H.
    McBean, E.
    Motiei, A.
    [J]. URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2007, 4 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [26] Evaluation of a pressure head and pressure zones in water distribution systems by artificial neural networks
    Dawidowicz, Jacek
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2018, 30 (08): : 2531 - 2538
  • [27] Evaluation of a pressure head and pressure zones in water distribution systems by artificial neural networks
    Jacek Dawidowicz
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 30 : 2531 - 2538
  • [28] Performance comparison of reduced models for leak detection in water distribution networks
    Moser, Gaudenz
    Paal, Stephanie German
    Smith, Ian F. C.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2015, 29 (03) : 714 - 726
  • [29] Comparison of ANN models for predicting water quality in distribution systems
    D'Souza, Celia D.
    Kumar, M. S. Mohan
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 102 (07): : 92 - +
  • [30] Performance Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS Based Wind Speed Sensor-less MPPT Controller
    Rahman, M. M. Atiqur
    Rahim, A. H. M. A.
    [J]. 2016 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, ELECTRONICS AND VISION (ICIEV), 2016, : 542 - 546