Creation of a Walloon Pasture Monitoring Platform Based on Machine Learning Models and Remote Sensing

被引:1
|
作者
Nickmilder, Charles [1 ]
Tedde, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Dufrasne, Isabelle [3 ,4 ]
Lessire, Francoise [3 ,4 ]
Glesner, Noemie [5 ]
Tychon, Bernard [6 ]
Bindelle, Jerome [1 ]
Soyeurt, Helene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, TERRA Res & Teaching Ctr, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, Passage Deportes 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[2] Natl Fund Sci Res, Rue Egmont 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Ctr Technol Agron, Rue Charmille 16, B-4577 Modave, Belgium
[4] FARAH Ctr, Dept Gest Veterinaire Ressources Anim DRA, Nutr Animaux Domest, Quartier Vallee 2,Ave Cureghem 6, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[5] Fourrages Mieux ASBL, Horritine 1, B-6600 Bastogne, Belgium
[6] Univ Liege, Environm Sci & Management Dept, Spheres Res Unit, Water Environm & Dev Lab, 185 Ave Longwy,Arlon Campus Environm, B-6700 Arlon, Belgium
关键词
pasture; decision support system; machine learning; remote sensing; Sentinel satellite; meteorological data; SENSITIVITY; GRASSLANDS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.3390/rs15071890
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of remote sensing data and the implementation of machine learning (ML) algorithms is growing in pasture management. In this study, ML models predicting the available compressed sward height (CSH) in Walloon pastures based on Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and meteorological data were developed to be integrated into a decision support system (DSS). Given the area covered (>4000 km(2) of pastures of 100 m(2) pixels), the consequent challenge of computation time and power requirements was overcome by the development of a platform predicting CSH throughout Wallonia. Four grazing seasons were covered in the current study (between April and October from 2018 to 2021, the mean predicted CSH per parcel per date ranged from 48.6 to 67.2 mm, and the coefficient of variation from 0 to 312%, suggesting a strong heterogeneity of variability of CSH between parcels. Further exploration included the number of predictions expected per grazing season and the search for temporal and spatial patterns and consistency. The second challenge tackled is the poor data availability for concurrent acquisition, which was overcome through the inclusion of up to 4-day-old data to fill data gaps up to the present time point. For this gap filling methodology, relevancy decreased as the time window width increased, although data with 4-day time lag values represented less than 4% of the total data. Overall, two models stood out, and further studies should either be based on the random forest model if they need prediction quality or on the cubist model if they need continuity. Further studies should focus on developing the DSS and on the conversion of CSH to actual forage allowance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote Sensing Monitoring of Grassland Locust Density Based on Machine Learning
    Du, Qiang
    Wang, Zhiguo
    Huang, Pingping
    Zhai, Yongguang
    Yang, Xiangli
    Ma, Shuai
    [J]. SENSORS, 2024, 24 (10)
  • [2] An Integrated Monitoring System for Coastal and Riparian Areas Based on Remote Sensing and Machine Learning
    Tzepkenlis, Anastasios
    Grammalidis, Nikos
    Kontopoulos, Christos
    Charalampopoulou, Vasiliki
    Kitsiou, Dimitra
    Pataki, Zoi
    Patera, Anastasia
    Nitis, Theodoros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [3] Monitoring soil nutrients using machine learning based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing
    Liu, Kai
    Wang, Yufeng
    Peng, Zhiqing
    Xu, Xinxin
    Liu, Jingjing
    Song, Yuehui
    Di, Huige
    Hua, Dengxin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 45 (14) : 4897 - 4921
  • [4] OpenMapFlow: A Library for Rapid Map Creation with Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Data
    Zvonkov, Ivan
    Tseng, Gabriel
    Nakalembe, Catherine
    Kerner, Hannah
    [J]. THIRTY-SEVENTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 37 NO 12, 2023, : 14655 - 14663
  • [5] UAVs, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing, and Machine Learning Revolutionizing Reef Monitoring
    Parsons, Mark
    Bratanov, Dmitry
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Gonzalez, Felipe
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (07)
  • [6] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Remote Sensing Monitoring of Rice Yields
    Jing Xia
    Zhang Jie
    Wang Jiao-jiao
    Ming Shi-kang
    Fu You-qiang
    Feng Hai-kuan
    Song Xiao-yu
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (05) : 1620 - 1627
  • [7] Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Estimation Models for Pasture Quality
    Ma Wei-wei
    Gong Cai-lan
    Hu Yong
    Wei Yong-lin
    Li Long
    Liu Feng-yi
    Meng Peng
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (10) : 2851 - 2855
  • [8] Identification of Pasture Degradation Using Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning: A Case Study of Obichnik
    Evstatiev, Boris
    Valova, Irena
    Kaneva, Tsvetelina
    Valov, Nikolay
    Sevov, Atanas
    Stanchev, Georgi
    Komitov, Georgi
    Zhelyazkova, Tsenka
    Gerdzhikova, Mariya
    Todorova, Mima
    Grozeva, Neli
    Saliev, Durhan
    Damyanov, Iliyan
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (17):
  • [9] Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhou, Yulong
    Daud, Hamza
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [10] The Remote sensing approaches for Pasture biomass estimation and monitoring in Mongolia
    Magsar, E.
    [J]. NETWORKING THE WORLD WITH REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 : 787 - 788