Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management

被引:54
|
作者
Yuan, Yuan [1 ,5 ]
Bai, Zhongke [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Zhang, Junjie [4 ,6 ]
Huang, Yuhan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Technol Innovat Ctr Ecol Restorat Engn Min Area, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, 29 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou City 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Supply and demand assessment; Trade-offs; Spatial management; Changzhi City; LAND-USE; CARBON STORAGE; RIVER-BASIN; URBAN; LANDSCAPE; CAPACITY; INDICATORS; PATTERNS; CLIMATE; BUNDLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the supply and demand characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) and their trade-offs is the basis for effective ecosystem management and the improvement of human well-being. However, current management practices based on the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ESs remain limited. This study aimed to integrate ES trade-offs into regional spatial management. With Changzhi, China, as the study area, this study evaluated the supply, demand, and trade-offs of food provision, water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration by linking multi-source data and using spatial analysis tools, including the InVEST model, ArcGIS, and GeoDA. Based on the trade-offs and importance of different ecological functions, we constructed an urban spatial management framework and proposed recommendations for optimization in different management zones. The results showed that (1) the supply and demand for multiple ESs exhibited spatial heterogeneity. Except for water conservation, the supply of other ESs met the demand of the city, but there were still obvious deficits in some regions. (2) In terms of the ES supply, there were trade-offs between food production and other ESs, and synergies existed among water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration. In terms of the ES demand, the four ESs exhibited synergistic relationships. In the cluster analysis, ES supply and demand were divided into four ES bundles, respectively. (3) The spatial mismatch of ESs in the sub-watersheds of the study area was obvious. The ESDR coldspots for the four ESs were primarily located in the urban built-up areas in the central and southern regions of the city. The ESDR hotspots of soil retention and carbon sequestration were mainly distributed in the eastern and northwestern regions of Changzhi, which are less urbanized. There were few ESDR hotspots for food production and water conservation. (4) Based on the regional spatial management framework, Changzhi was divided into ten zones, including extremely important, moderately important, important, sup-ply-demand risk management, soil erosion management, and high food production areas. The results and con-clusions of this study provide a basis for spatial planning and ecosystem management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and their trade-offs in the Hengduan Mountain region, Southwest China
    Wang, Yahui
    Dai, Erfu
    Ge, Quansheng
    Zhang, Xianzhou
    Yu, Chengqun
    CATENA, 2021, 207
  • [42] Biophysical and sociocultural factors underlying spatial trade-offs of ecosystem services in semiarid watersheds
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Iniesta-Arandia, Irene
    Willaarts, Barbara A.
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Berry, Pam
    Bayo, Maria del Mar
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Montes, Carlos
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (03):
  • [43] Spatial-Temporal Evolution, Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Qinba Mountains
    He, Xiaofeng
    Li, Wenqing
    Xu, Xingchao
    Zhao, Xueyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [44] Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China
    Dou, Huashun
    Li, Xiaobing
    Li, Shengkun
    Dang, Dongliang
    Li, Xiang
    Lyu, Xin
    Li, Mengyuan
    Liu, Siyu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256
  • [45] Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot
    Lin, Shiwei
    Wu, Ruidong
    Yang, Feiling
    Wang, Junjun
    Wu, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 371 - 381
  • [46] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in an alpine ecosystem grazed by sheep - An experimental approach
    Austrheim, Gunnar
    Speed, James D. M.
    Evju, Marianne
    Hester, Alison
    Holand, Oystein
    Loe, Leif Egil
    Martinsen, Vegard
    Mobaek, Ragnhild
    Mulder, Jan
    Steen, Harald
    Thompson, Des B. A.
    Mysterud, Atle
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 17 (07) : 596 - 608
  • [47] Advancing the optimization of urban–rural ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches and trade-offs
    Guangji Fang
    Xiao Sun
    Ranhao Sun
    Qinghua Liu
    Yu Tao
    Peng Yang
    Huajun Tang
    Landscape Ecology, 39
  • [48] Trade-offs in ecosystem services under various river management strategies of the Rhine Branches
    Kok, Sien
    Le Clec'h, Solen
    Penning, W. Ellis
    Buijse, Anthonie Dirk
    Hein, Lars
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 72
  • [49] Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management
    Schwaiger, Fabian
    Poschenrieder, Werner
    Biber, Peter
    Pretzsch, Hans
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [50] Navigating ecosystem services trade-offs: A global comprehensive review
    Martinez-Harms, Maria Jose
    Larrain-Barrios, Barbara
    Arregoitia, Luis D. Verde
    Palma-Duque, Jose
    Gelcich, Stefan
    AMBIO, 2025,