Readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review

被引:2
|
作者
Unlu, Huseyin [1 ]
Demirors, Onur [1 ]
Garousi, Vahid [2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Inst Technol, Comp Engn Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Elect Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
关键词
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI); Industry; 4.0; maturity; readiness; Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination (Spice); systematic literature review; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/smr.2641
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 changes traditional manufacturing relationships from isolated optimized cells to fully integrated data and product flows across borders with its technological pillars. However, the transition to Industry 4.0 is not a straightforward journey in which organizations need assistance. A well-known approach that can be utilized during the early phases of the transition is to assess the capability of the organization. Maturity models are frequently used to improve capability. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we analyzed 22 maturity and readiness models based on 10 criteria: year, type, focus, structure, research methodology followed during the design of models, base frameworks, tool support, community support, objectivity, and extent of usage in practice. Our SLR provides a well-defined comparison for organizations to choose and apply available models. This SLR showed that (1) there is no widely accepted maturity/readiness model for Industry 4.0, as well as no international standard; (2) only a few models have received positive feedback from the industry, whereas most do not provide any practical usage information; and (3) the objectivity of the assessment method is controversial in most of the models. We have also identified a number of issues as open research areas for assessing readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0. In this SLR, we analyzed 22 maturity and readiness models based on year, type, focus, structure, research methodology followed during the design of models, base frameworks, tool support, community support, objectivity, and extent of usage in practice. This SLR showed that (1) there is no widely accepted model for Industry 4.0, as well as no international standard; (2) only a few models received feedback from the industry; and (3) the objectivity of the assessment method is controversial in most models.image
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory
    Albayrak, Fatih
    Poyrazoglu, Oguz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023,
  • [42] Intelligent Warehouse in Industry 4.0-Systematic Literature Review
    Tubis, Agnieszka A.
    Rohman, Juni
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (08)
  • [43] The digitization of agricultural industry - a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0
    Abbasi, Rabiya
    Martinez, Pablo
    Ahmad, Rafiq
    [J]. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 2
  • [44] A systematic literature review on the application of process mining to Industry 4.0
    Akhramovich, Katsiaryna
    Serral, Estefania
    Cetina, Carlos
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 66 (05) : 2699 - 2746
  • [45] An Institutional Perspective in The Industry 4.0 Scenario: A Systematic Literature Review
    Fogaca, Diego
    Grijalvo, Mercedes
    Neto, Mario Sacomano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-JIEM, 2022, 15 (02): : 309 - 322
  • [46] Logistics Service Providers and Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review
    da Silva, Ricardo Moreira
    Frederico, Guilherme Francisco
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    [J]. LOGISTICS-BASEL, 2023, 7 (01):
  • [47] Supply chain integration and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review
    Tiwari, Saurabh
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (03) : 990 - 1030
  • [48] Maturity Models of Quality Management System in High-Tech Industry: a Systematic Literature Review
    Shrayner, Yulia S.
    Vladimir, Yashchenko V.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE CONFERENCE OF RUSSIAN YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING (EICONRUS), 2019, : 1478 - 1484
  • [49] A SURVEY OF THE READINESS AND MATURITY LEVEL OF INDUSTRY 4.0 AT TWENTY COMPANIES IN PAKISTAN
    Khan, Uzair
    Ahmad, Wasim
    Imran, Muhammad
    [J]. HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 51 (01): : 55 - 59
  • [50] A Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Models: Theoretical Comparison in The Smart Manufacturing Sector
    Elhusseiny, Hussein Magdy
    Crispim, Jose
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING, ISM 2023, 2024, 232 : 1869 - 1878