Readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review

被引:2
|
作者
Unlu, Huseyin [1 ]
Demirors, Onur [1 ]
Garousi, Vahid [2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Inst Technol, Comp Engn Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Elect Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
关键词
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI); Industry; 4.0; maturity; readiness; Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination (Spice); systematic literature review; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/smr.2641
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 changes traditional manufacturing relationships from isolated optimized cells to fully integrated data and product flows across borders with its technological pillars. However, the transition to Industry 4.0 is not a straightforward journey in which organizations need assistance. A well-known approach that can be utilized during the early phases of the transition is to assess the capability of the organization. Maturity models are frequently used to improve capability. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we analyzed 22 maturity and readiness models based on 10 criteria: year, type, focus, structure, research methodology followed during the design of models, base frameworks, tool support, community support, objectivity, and extent of usage in practice. Our SLR provides a well-defined comparison for organizations to choose and apply available models. This SLR showed that (1) there is no widely accepted maturity/readiness model for Industry 4.0, as well as no international standard; (2) only a few models have received positive feedback from the industry, whereas most do not provide any practical usage information; and (3) the objectivity of the assessment method is controversial in most of the models. We have also identified a number of issues as open research areas for assessing readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0. In this SLR, we analyzed 22 maturity and readiness models based on year, type, focus, structure, research methodology followed during the design of models, base frameworks, tool support, community support, objectivity, and extent of usage in practice. This SLR showed that (1) there is no widely accepted model for Industry 4.0, as well as no international standard; (2) only a few models received feedback from the industry; and (3) the objectivity of the assessment method is controversial in most models.image
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Industry 4.0 Maturity and Readiness Models: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Framework
    Hajoary, Pinosh Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (07)
  • [2] Industry 4.0 Readiness Models: A Systematic Literature Review of Model Dimensions
    Hizam-Hanafiah, Mohd
    Soomro, Mansoor Ahmed
    Abdullah, Nor Liza
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (07) : 1 - 13
  • [3] METAMODEL OF INDEXES AND MATURITY MODELS FOR INDUSTRY 4.0 READINESS IN ENTERPRISES
    Basl, Josef
    Doucek, Petr
    [J]. STRATEGIC MODELING IN MANAGEMENT, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY (IDIMT-2018), 2018, 47 : 33 - 40
  • [4] Education 4.0 Maturity Models for Society 5.0: Systematic literature review
    Icela, Gonzalez-Perez Laura
    Soledad, Ramirez-Montoya Maria
    Antonio, Enciso-Gonzalez Juan
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [5] Systematic Literature Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Model for Manufacturing and Logistics Sectors
    Angreani, Linda Salma
    Vijaya, Annas
    Wicaksono, Hendro
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM-INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCE (SYSINT 2020): SYSTEM-INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCE - INTELLIGENT, FLEXIBLE AND CONNECTED SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION, 2020, 52 : 337 - 343
  • [6] A systematic review of Industry 4.0 maturity models: applicability in the O&G upstream industry
    Onyeme, Chinedu
    Liyanage, Kapila
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (06) : 1160 - 1173
  • [7] Systematic Literature Review About Sustainable Business Models and Industry 4.0
    Gomes Teixeira, Grazielle Fatima
    Canciglieri Junior, Osiris
    [J]. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLM IN TRANSITION TIMES: THE PLACE OF HUMANS AND TRANSFORMATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, PLM 2022, 2023, 667 : 55 - 65
  • [8] A systematic literature review for industry 4.0 maturity modeling: state-of-the-art and future challenges
    Elibal, Kerem
    Ozceylan, Eren
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2021, 50 (11) : 2957 - 2994
  • [9] Decision Models for Supplier Selection in Industry 4.0 Era: A Systematic Literature Review
    Resende, Carlos H. L.
    Geraldes, Carla A. S.
    Lima Junior, Francisco Rodrigues
    [J]. FAIM 2021, 2021, 55 : 492 - 499
  • [10] Industry 4.0 as an enabler in transitioning to circular business models: A systematic literature review
    Toth-Peter, Agnes
    de Oliveira, Rui Torres
    Mathews, Shane
    Barner, Leonie
    Figueira, Sandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 393