Examining Transit Activity Data from StreetLight Using Ridership Data from Virginia Transit Agencies

被引:0
|
作者
Raida, Afrida [1 ]
Ohlms, Peter B. [2 ]
Chen, T. Donna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Virginia Transportat Res Council, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
planning and analysis; data sources; performance metrics; public transportation; big data; ridership analysis;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231197667
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Researchers and planners require ridership data to study factors that influence people's choice to use transit. However, the data can be challenging to obtain directly from transit agencies. Crowdsourced big data platforms such as StreetLight promise easily accessible ridership-related data in standard formats. It is important to assess the reliability of these data, particularly for transit agencies serving small- to medium-sized cities, which are less likely than agencies in large cities to have ridership data in standard formats. In this study, hourly ridership data from 2019 were collected from four bus transit agencies and one rail agency in Virginia and compared with StreetLight data. Comparisons for rail data were made on a station-to-station basis. Bus data comparisons were made at the city-limit level and at an aggregated-route level for each agency. In sum, StreetLight could not provide 2019 bus activity data for more than half of the localities in Virginia. Comparisons between transit agency and StreetLight data showed smaller root mean square errors when longer periods were analyzed (e.g., 4 versus 2 months). Although order of magnitude of ridership may indicate whether StreetLight can provide bus activity data, the former was not found to be correlated with the accuracy of the latter. Using data from StreetLight's current algorithm might not be appropriate without verification against agency data, especially for agencies in small- to medium-sized cities.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 443
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling the Influence of Weather on Transit Ridership: A Case Study from Brisbane, Australia
    Wei, Ming
    Corcoran, Jonathan
    Sigler, Thomas
    Liu, Yan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (08) : 505 - 510
  • [32] High Ridership Growth from Extended Transit Service Hours An Exploration of the Causes
    Currie, Graham
    Loader, Chris
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2110) : 120 - 127
  • [33] Bus rapid transit in Solo, Indonesia: Lessons from a low ridership system
    Guerra, Erick
    Gamble, Julie
    Taylor, John
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 8 (02) : 492 - 499
  • [34] Analysis of public transit service performance using transit smart card data in Seoul
    Jin Ki Eom
    Ji Young Song
    Dae-Seop Moon
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 19 : 1530 - 1537
  • [35] Neighborhood change and transit ridership: Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties
    Manville, Michael
    King, Hannah
    Matute, Juan
    Lau, Theodore
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 121
  • [36] Discovering latent activity patterns from transit smart card data: A spatiotemporal topic model
    Zhao, Zhan
    Koutsopoulos, Haris N.
    Zhao, Jinhua
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 116
  • [37] Analysis of public transit service performance using transit smart card data in Seoul
    Eom, Jin Ki
    Song, Ji Young
    Moon, Dae-Seop
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 19 (05) : 1530 - 1537
  • [38] Constructing Transit Origin-Destination Tables from Fragmented Data
    Kikuchi, Shinya
    Kronprasert, Nopadon
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2196) : 34 - 44
  • [39] Statistical Inference of Transit Passenger Boarding Strategies from Farecard Data
    Nassir, Neema
    Hickman, Mark
    Ma, Zhenliang
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2652) : 8 - 18
  • [40] Temporal dynamics of catchment transit times from stable isotope data
    Klaus, Julian
    Chun, Kwok P.
    McGuire, Kevin J.
    McDonnell, Jeffrey J.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (06) : 4208 - 4223