The endometrial transcriptome transition preceding receptivity to embryo implantation in mice

被引:1
|
作者
Chan, Hon Yeung [1 ]
Tran, Ha M. [1 ]
Breen, James [1 ]
Schjenken, John E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Robertson, Sarah A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Sch Biomed, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Hunter Med Res Inst, Infertil & Reprod Res Program, New Lambton Hts, NSW 2305, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Prior Res Ctr Reprod Sci, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Discipline Biol Sci, Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
RNA sequencing; Uterus; Embryo implantation; Endometrial receptivity; Mouse; DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR; UTERINE RECEPTIVITY; GENE-EXPRESSION; BLASTOCYST IMPLANTATION; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTORS; INDIAN HEDGEHOG; MOUSE UTERUS; FACTOR-BETA; T-CELLS;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-023-09698-3
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BackgroundReceptivity of the uterus is essential for embryo implantation and progression of mammalian pregnancy. Acquisition of receptivity involves major molecular and cellular changes in the endometrial lining of the uterus from a non-receptive state at ovulation, to a receptive state several days later. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying this transition and their upstream regulators remain to be fully characterized. Here, we aimed to generate a comprehensive profile of the endometrial transcriptome in the peri-ovulatory and peri-implantation states, to define the genes and gene pathways that are different between these states, and to identify new candidate upstream regulators of this transition, in the mouse.ResultsHigh throughput RNA-sequencing was utilized to identify genes and pathways expressed in the endometrium of female C57Bl/6 mice at estrus and on day 3.5 post-coitum (pc) after mating with BALB/c males (n = 3-4 biological replicates). Compared to the endometrium at estrus, 388 genes were considered differentially expressed in the endometrium on day 3.5 post-coitum. The transcriptional changes indicated substantial modulation of uterine immune and vascular systems during the pre-implantation phase, with the functional terms Angiogenesis, Chemotaxis, and Lymphangiogenesis predominating. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software predicted the activation of several upstream regulators previously shown to be involved in the transition to receptivity including various cytokines, ovarian steroid hormones, prostaglandin E2, and vascular endothelial growth factor A. Our analysis also revealed four candidate upstream regulators that have not previously been implicated in the acquisition of uterine receptivity, with growth differentiation factor 2, lysine acetyltransferase 6 A, and N-6 adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 predicted to be activated, and peptidylprolyl isomerase F predicted to be inhibited.ConclusionsThis study confirms that the transcriptome of a receptive uterus is vastly different to the non-receptive uterus and identifies several genes, regulatory pathways, and upstream drivers not previously associated with implantation. The findings will inform further research to investigate the molecular mechanisms of uterine receptivity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiomics approaches to uncover endometrial receptivity in embryo implantation: a mini-review
    Fernando, Sudini R.
    Yan, Yang
    Kumar, Manish
    Lai, Hoi-Lam
    Lee, Yin-Lau
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    Yeung, William S. B.
    Lee, Kai-Fai
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE, 2024, 8 (03) : 178 - 185
  • [22] Podocalyxin is a key negative regulator of human endometrial epithelial receptivity for embryo implantation
    Paule, Sarah G.
    Heng, Sophea
    Samarajeewa, Nirukshi
    Li, Ying
    Mansilla, Mary
    Webb, Andrew, I
    Nebl, Thomas
    Young, Steven L.
    Lessey, Bruce A.
    Hull, M. Louise
    Scelwyn, Maxine
    Lim, Rebecca
    Vollenhoven, Beverley
    Rombauts, Luk J.
    Nie, Guiying
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (05) : 1353 - 1366
  • [23] An animal model of effects of nicotine exposure on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation in pregnancy
    Akpak, Yasam Kemal
    Cekmez, Yasemin
    Cakir, Asli Erdogan
    Karaca, Nilay
    Batmaz, Gonca
    Gulsen, Serdar
    Haberal, Esra Tustas
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (23): : 2818 - 2823
  • [24] Multiomics approaches to uncover endometrial receptivity in embryo implantation: a mini-review
    Fernando Sudini R
    Yan Yang
    Kumar Manish
    Lai HoiLam
    Lee YinLau
    Ng Ernest HY
    Yeung William SB
    Lee KaiFai
    生殖与发育医学(英文), 2024, 08 (03)
  • [25] Endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive techniques: An aspect to investigate in embryo implantation failure
    Baron, C.
    Haouzi, D.
    Gala, A.
    Ferrieres-Hoa, A.
    Vintejoux, E.
    Brouillet, S.
    Hamamah, S.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (02): : 128 - 136
  • [26] Implantation and diagnostics of endometrial receptivity
    Dvoran, M.
    Vodicka, J.
    Dostal, J.
    Hajduch, M.
    Dzubak, P.
    Peskova, M.
    Pilka, R.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 83 (04): : 291 - 299
  • [27] Rhizoma Drynariae Improves Endometrial Receptivity in a Mus Model of Dysfunctional Embryo Implantation
    Yue Shi
    Yan-Feng Liu
    Jia-Mei Wang
    Jing Jiang
    Bo-Lin He
    Guo-Hua Mu
    Fang Liu
    Ya-Hui Li
    Ting Qiao
    Jing Lu
    World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 9 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [28] Effects of intrauterine human chorionic gonadotropin administration on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation
    Lee, Danbi
    Lee, Yu-Gyeong
    Won, Jieun
    Hong, Seon-Hwa
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kang, Youn-Jung
    LIFE SCIENCES, 2022, 311
  • [29] Enhanced SUMOylation of HOXA10 impairs endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation
    Jiang, R.
    Zhang, Q.
    Yan, Q.
    Kong, N.
    Liu, J.
    Diao, Z.
    Ding, L.
    Sun, H.
    Yan, G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 50 - 50
  • [30] Endoglin (CD105) coordinates the process of endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation
    Chadchan, Sangappa Basanna
    Kumar, Vijay
    Maurya, Vineet Kumar
    Soni, Upendra Kumar
    Jha, Rajesh Kumar
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 425 (0C) : 69 - 83