Comparison of magnetic energy and helicity in coronal jet simulations

被引:2
|
作者
Pariat, E. [1 ]
Wyper, P. F. [2 ]
Linan, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Sorbonne Univ, Ecole Polytech, Inst Polytech Paris,Observ Paris PSL,CNRS,Lab Phys, 4 Pl Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Math Sci, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Math Plasma Astrophys, Dept Math, Celestijnenlaan 200 B, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Sun; magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); magnetic reconnection; methods; numerical; activity; SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS; QUASI-SEPARATRIX LAYERS; FLUX-DENSITY; FILAMENT ERUPTIONS; BREAKOUT MODEL; FLARE RIBBONS; CONNECTIVITY; RECONNECTION; INJECTION; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202245142
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. While non-potential (free) magnetic energy is a necessary element of any active phenomenon in the solar corona, its role as a marker of the trigger of the eruptive process remains elusive. Meanwhile, recent analyses of numerical simulations of solar active events have shown that quantities based on relative magnetic helicity could highlight the eruptive nature of solar magnetic systems.Aims. Based on the unique decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and non-potential components, magnetic energy and helicity can also both be uniquely decomposed into two quantities. Using two 3D magnetohydrodynamics parametric simulations of a configuration that can produce coronal jets, we compare the dynamics of the magnetic energies and of the relative magnetic helicities.Methods. Both simulations share the same initial setup and line-tied bottom-boundary driving profile. However, they differ by the duration of the forcing. In one simulation, the system is driven sufficiently so that a point of no return is passed and the system induces the generation of a helical jet. The generation of the jet is, however, markedly delayed after the end of the driving phase; a relatively long phase of lower-intensity reconnection takes place before the jet is eventually induced. In the other reference simulation, the system is driven during a shorter time, and no jet is produced.Results. As expected, we observe that the jet-producing simulation contains a higher value of non-potential energy and non-potential helicity compared to the non-eruptive system. Focussing on the phase between the end of the driving-phase and the jet generation, we note that magnetic energies remain relatively constant, while magnetic helicities have a noticeable evolution. During this post-driving phase, the ratio of the non-potential to total magnetic energy very slightly decreases while the helicity eruptivity index, which is the ratio of the non-potential helicity to the total relative magnetic helicity, significantly increases. The jet is generated when the system is at the highest value of this helicity eruptivity index. This proxy critically decreases during the jet-generation phase. The free energy also decreases but does not present any peak when the jet is being generated.Conclusions. Our study further strengthens the importance of helicities, and in particular of the helicity eruptivity index, to understand the trigger mechanism of solar eruptive events.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evolution of Magnetic Helicity During Eruptive Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections
    Priest, E. R.
    Longcope, D. W.
    Janvier, M.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2016, 291 (07) : 2017 - 2036
  • [32] SIMULATIONS OF TURBULENT DYNAMOS DRIVEN BY THE MAGNETIC HELICITY FLUX
    Shapovalov, Dmitry S.
    Vishniac, Ethan T.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 738 (01):
  • [33] Equatorial magnetic helicity flux in simulations with different gauges
    Mitra, D.
    Candelaresi, S.
    Chatterjee, P.
    Tavakol, R.
    Brandenburg, A.
    ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN, 2010, 331 (01) : 130 - 135
  • [34] Energy dissipation and helicity in coronal loops of variable cross-section
    R.M. Lothian
    P.K. Browning
    Solar Physics, 2000, 194 : 205 - 227
  • [35] Energy dissipation and helicity in coronal loops of variable cross-section
    Lothian, RM
    Browning, PK
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2000, 194 (02) : 205 - 227
  • [36] Magnetic flux cancellation and coronal magnetic energy
    Welsch, BT
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 638 (02): : 1101 - 1109
  • [37] The solar magnetic field as a coronal hole extension forms: Effects of magnetic helicity and boundary conditions
    Clegg, JR
    Bromage, BJI
    Browning, PK
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1999, 87 (1-2) : 145 - 148
  • [38] The Solar Magnetic Field as a Coronal Hole Extension Forms: Effects of Magnetic Helicity and Boundary Conditions
    J. R. Clegg
    B. J. I. Bromage
    P. K. Browning
    Space Science Reviews, 1999, 87 : 145 - 148
  • [39] Jet Structure of Electric Currents in Coronal Magnetic Loops
    Zaitsev, V. V.
    Kruglov, A. A.
    ASTRONOMY REPORTS, 2008, 52 (11) : 925 - 930
  • [40] Jet structure of electric currents in coronal magnetic loops
    V. V. Zaĭtsev
    A. A. Kruglov
    Astronomy Reports, 2008, 52 : 925 - 930