Multiscale spatially varying coefficient modelling using a Geographical Gaussian Process GAM

被引:2
|
作者
Comber, Alexis [1 ]
Harris, Paul [2 ]
Brunsdon, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds, England
[2] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Agr Sci, North Wyke, England
[3] Maynooth Univ, Natl Ctr Geocomputat, Maynooth, Ireland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Spatial regression; GWR; TEMPORALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; AUTOCORRELATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/13658816.2023.2270285
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a novel spatially varying coefficient (SVC) regression through a Geographical Gaussian Process GAM (GGP-GAM): a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) with Gaussian Process (GP) splines parameterised at observation locations. A GGP-GAM was applied to multiple simulated coefficient datasets exhibiting varying degrees of spatial heterogeneity and out-performed the SVC brand-leader, Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR), under a range of fit metrics. Both were then applied to a Brexit case study and compared, with MGWR marginally out-performing GGP-GAM. The theoretical frameworks and implementation of both approaches are discussed: GWR models calibrate multiple models whereas GAMs provide a full single model; GAMs can automatically penalise local collinearity; GWR-based approaches are computationally more demanding; MGWR is still only for Gaussian responses; MGWR bandwidths are intuitive indicators of spatial heterogeneity. GGP-GAM calibration and tuning are also discussed and areas of future work are identified, including the creation of a user-friendly package to support model creation and coefficient mapping, and to facilitate ease of comparison with alternate SVC models. A final observation that GGP-GAMs have the potential to overcome some of the long-standing reservations about GWR-based regression methods and to elevate the perception of SVCs amongst the broader community.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:27 / 47
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rate coefficient function estimation using Gaussian process regression
    Abrantes, Richard J. E.
    Mao, Yun-Wen
    Ren, David D. W.
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2022, 283
  • [22] Numerical modelling of the keying process for a suction embedded plate anchor in spatially varying clays
    Cheng, Po
    Yong, Liu
    Zhang, Yuhe
    Liu, Xia
    Yin, Shuai
    Yao, Kai
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2024, 18 (02) : 391 - 409
  • [23] Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression
    Pal, Mahesh
    Deswal, Surinder
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2010, 37 (7-8) : 942 - 947
  • [24] Bayesian classification of hyperspectral images using spatially-varying Gaussian mixture model
    Kayabol, Koray
    Kutluk, Sezer
    DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 59 : 106 - 114
  • [25] Crop Yield Prediction Using Bayesian Spatially Varying Coefficient Models with Functional Predictors
    Park, Yeonjoo
    Li, Bo
    Li, Yehua
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 118 (541) : 70 - 83
  • [26] LES INFORMED DATA-DRIVEN MODELLING OF A SPATIALLY VARYING TURBULENT DIFFUSIVITY COEFFICIENT IN FILM COOLING FLOWS
    Ellis, Christopher D.
    Xia, Hao
    Page, Gary J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, VOL 7B, PT I, 2020,
  • [27] Modelling of infiltration of sandy soil using gaussian process regression
    Sihag P.
    Tiwari N.K.
    Ranjan S.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017, 3 (3) : 1091 - 1100
  • [28] MODELLING OCCUPANCY-QUEUE RELATION USING GAUSSIAN PROCESS
    Prikryl, Jan
    Kocijan, Jus
    NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2015, 25 (01) : 35 - 52
  • [29] Flexible temporal expression profile modelling using the Gaussian process
    Yuan, Ming
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 51 (03) : 1754 - 1764
  • [30] Multi-compartment heart segmentation in CT angiography using a spatially varying gaussian classifier
    S. Murphy
    A. Akinyemi
    J. Steel
    Y. Petillot
    I. Poole
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2012, 7 : 829 - 836